-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
2019.09.03 Editors Meeting
Simeon Warner edited this page Sep 3, 2019
·
5 revisions
https://lyrasis.zoom.us/my/vivo1
- Julian Morley (Stanford)
- Rosy Metz (Emory)
- Simeon Warner (Cornell)*
- Andrew Hankinson (Bodleian Libraries)
- Andrew Woods (DuraSpace)
- Neil Jefferies (Bodleian Libraries)
(* indicates the notetaker)
- Review action items from last meeting
- Andrew H. to extract out the "MUST"s from spec into validation rules -- no progress
- Julian: ask Stanford if we can review the agenda for preservation API event -- need to provide attendees with information soon... Julian to follow up with Tom
- Julian: consider what a guidance document of the OCFL stack (on the wiki) would look like -- still to do
- Locking and filesystems/cloud
- Discussion on
#ocfl
slack about differences in requirements for locking/conflict-avoidance between posix filesystems (fairly well understood) and cloud stores (not clear) - Would like to discuss this at the next community meeting
- Discussion on
- Encrypted OCFL objects - Simeon
- Is there really need to encrypt beyond local filesystem or S3 encryption setting?
- DPN wanted to do bitstream encryption but it got nowhere
- Julian notes that Backblaze as a bucket provider then they provide key and it is customer responsibility to manage that
- No desire for bitstream level encryption at Stanford or Emory, using storage level encryption instead
- Issues
- https://github.com/OCFL/spec/issues/365 -- the term RFC is really confusing and the proposed scheme conflicts with IETF RFCs, agreement that we should have some other term
Do the previous actions!
- Andrew H. to extract out the "MUST"s from spec into validation rules
- Julian: ask Stanford if we can review the agenda for preservation API event
- Julian: consider what a guidance document of the OCFL stack (on the wiki) would look like