-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Put null helpers back #1002
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1002 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 47.94%
=======================================
Files ? 77
Lines ? 7463
Branches ? 0
=======================================
Hits ? 3578
Misses ? 3553
Partials ? 332
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
⏱️ Benchmark results
|
) | ||
|
||
//nolint:unused | ||
func stripNullsFromLists(records []arrow.Record) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we adding unused code? Will there be a follow-up where it gets used?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I was just migrating CH when I noticed this missing.
I can comment out the relevant section in CH tests, but it will still be required once we bring the vast testing back
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can leave this here as a reminder, but can we rather add it back when it's needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯
9961903
to
08edb0f
Compare
08edb0f
to
481df65
Compare
481df65
to
4fa4143
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Im approving to unblock but in general I think we should somehow come with an approach that is either on the plugin side or generalize better otherwise the testing code is going to get out of hand quickly.
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [4.3.1-rc1](v4.3.0-rc1...v4.3.1-rc1) (2023-06-29) ### Bug Fixes * Enable double migration test ([#1023](#1023)) ([466796b](466796b)) * Put null helpers back ([#1002](#1002)) ([95ed5df](95ed5df)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Return of the code from #913