Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CCPP Scientific Documentation updates for UFS-SRW v2.1.0 #14

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 1, 2022

Conversation

mzhangw
Copy link
Collaborator

@mzhangw mzhangw commented Oct 14, 2022

CCPP SciDoc updates for UFS-SRW v2.1.0 release. The website results can be viewed here.
@lisa-bengtsson @joeolson42 @gthompsnWRF

RTs pass on Hera.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@mzhangw Please merge in the latest ufs/dev branch of ccpp/physics when you get a chance.

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

@mzhangw Could you help to check if it can compile RT control_p8 successfully? git clone -b feature/srw_wofs --recursive https://github.com/ChunxiZhang-NOAA/ufs-weather-model.git It failed to compile. But if I check out ccpp-physics hash d93ce1a, it can compile successfully.

@mzhangw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mzhangw commented Oct 24, 2022

I am kicking off RTs today and will let you know how it goes.

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

@mzhangw Ok, thanks.

@mzhangw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mzhangw commented Oct 24, 2022

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA It should be fixed now,i.e. control_p8 compiles and passes. This PR picks up another possible bug on the host model side: there is no nf_albd defined on the host model side. I have added it on /scratch1/BMC/gmtb/Man.Zhang/_srw_2_1_0_doc/ufs-weather-model/FV3/ccpp/data. Could you confirm it? Do I need to submit a PR at fv3atm?

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@mzhangw You don't need to open superrepository PRs. This is being pulled in with NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#594

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

@mzhangw Thank you so much for fixing the bug. Do you know why it didn't show up before this PR? I can add your modification in the fv3atm PR#594.

@mzhangw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mzhangw commented Oct 25, 2022 via email

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

Agreed. And I think the dimension nf_albd can pass into setalb as an argument. So no radiation_surface.meta required anymore, and the definition/assignment of nf_albd can be removed in radiation_surface.f.

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

I modified the code and did a quick test with control_p8. It passed regression test. I modified GFS_radiation_surface.F90 (meta), radiation_surface.f, and deleted radiation_surface.meta. The code is located at: /scratch1/NCEPDEV/hwrf/save/Chunxi.Zhang/mytest/ufs-weather-model/FV3/ccpp/physics/physics

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

@mzhangw Is this PR ready to go?

@mzhangw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mzhangw commented Oct 27, 2022 via email

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

Yes, it looks good to me.

On Oct 27, 2022, at 9:35 AM, ChunxiZhang-NOAA @.***> wrote: @mzhangw https://github.com/mzhangw Is this PR ready to go? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#14 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG7TW2U3RFXWOT7MRBMLQPTWFKONXANCNFSM6AAAAAARFTX7TU. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Good to know. Thanks. The commit process is scheduled to start tomorrow.

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

@mzhangw Could you please make your branch update-to-date?

@mzhangw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mzhangw commented Oct 31, 2022 via email

@ChunxiZhang-NOAA
Copy link

Done

On Oct 30, 2022, at 7:54 PM, ChunxiZhang-NOAA @.***> wrote: @mzhangw https://github.com/mzhangw Could you please make your branch update-to-date? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#14 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG7TW2QBINEDNPINAAHD6XDWF4REZANCNFSM6AAAAAARFTX7TU. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants