-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(BackUpSeed): Confirm # word input had no focus #7958
Merged
+14
−0
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My proposition is to put it directly to components:
to avoid comparing to index numbers and better fulfill solid's open-close principle.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hey @micieslak visibility in StackLayout items is not working this way unless it's explicitly set like
visible: stack.currentIndex === 1
,visible: stack.currentIndex === 2
etc . so it's kind of the same thing - the current index should be checked and compared. See video for credibility :Dhttps://user-images.githubusercontent.com/31625338/196982590-8daf01f8-011a-488a-835d-4c7352fe4116.mov
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @alexandraB99. I found the source of misunderstanding :)
StackLayout
works exactly this way - current item is visible, the rest is not visible. But... we are not using rawStackLayout
. We are usingStatusAnimatedStack
which is buggy and setsvisible
in a strange way, exactly as you presented (I was able to reproduce that as well). On this movie I print visibility after temporarily changing to plainStackLayout
:Kazam_screencast_00071.webm
Probably
StatusAnimatedStack
should have been based onStackView
which has build-in support for animated transitions, but ofc it's a different story.So I agree on current solution, but I would at least add some comment about the reason why it's done this way, and, ideally, create a new ticket for that bug in
StatusAnimatedStack
. Wdyt?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@micieslak comment added and issue, there you go: #8024