Remove vite.config.ts from coverage listing

[drazisil]

Fixes #2096

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the testing framework configuration to include vite.config.ts, enhancing testing coverage and reliability of the build process.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes made to the Vite configuration involve adding the configuration file itself to the testing framework's inclusion list. This adjustment ensures that the vite.config.ts file is now part of the testing process, enhancing the overall testing coverage of the configuration.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
vite.config.ts	Added "vite.config.ts" to the testing framework's inclusion list.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagrams generated as the changes do not warrant this.)

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Remove vite.config.ts from coverage listing (#2096)	❌	Change adds the file to coverage instead.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code where the bunnies play,
A config file joined the tests today.
With hops and skips, it’s now in the race,
Ensuring our builds find a happy place!
So let’s cheer for changes, both bright and bold,
In the garden of coding, new stories unfold! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits d0bdb42..d4703b9. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
JavaScript	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0bdb42 and d4703b9.

Files selected for processing (1)

• vite.config.ts (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

vite.config.ts (1)

13-13: LGTM!

The addition of "vite.config.ts" to the exclude array within the coverage configuration is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.

The code changes are approved.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 33.20%. Comparing base (d0bdb42) to head (d4703b9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files	Patch %	Lines
vite.config.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #2097   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   33.20%   33.20%           
=======================================
  Files         207      207           
  Lines       13593    13593           
  Branches      409      420   +11     
=======================================
  Hits         4513     4513           
  Misses       9080     9080           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
cli	23.66% <0.00%> (ø)
connection	23.66% <0.00%> (ø)
core	100.00% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from d0bdb42
database	30.76% <ø> (ø)
gateway	7.91% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from d0bdb42
lobby	21.42% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from d0bdb42
login	40.28% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from d0bdb42
mcots	23.66% <0.00%> (ø)
nps	23.66% <0.00%> (ø)
patch	65.04% <ø> (ø)
persona	37.52% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from d0bdb42
shard	47.71% <ø> (ø)
shared	23.75% <ø> (ø)
shared-packets	23.66% <0.00%> (ø)
transactions	56.16% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from d0bdb42

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.