Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc: remove outdated CSS .sub-variant > div > .item-info #101491

Merged

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@notriddle notriddle commented Sep 6, 2022

This CSS still matches sometimes, as you can see in https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.63.0/std/collections/enum.TryReserveErrorKind.html#variant.AllocError.fields, but since nothing else is setting margin-top, putting it back to initial does nothing.

This selector was added here, but it was called .stability instead of .item-info at the time, probably as an override for the selector immediately above it that sets a negative margin:

.content .stability {
position: relative;
margin-left: 33px;
margin-top: -13px;
}
.sub-variant > div > .stability {
margin-top: initial;
}

That negative margin was removed in 593d6d1.

This CSS still matches sometimes, as you can see in
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.63.0/std/collections/enum.TryReserveErrorKind.html#variant.AllocError.fields>,
but since nothing else is setting `margin-top`, putting it back to `initial`
does nothing.

This selector was added in 2fd378b (but it
was called `.stability` instead of `.item-info` at the time), probably as an
override for the selector immediately above it that sets a negative margin.
That negative margin was removed in 593d6d1.
@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 6, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 6, 2022

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @GuillaumeGomez

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 6, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks! r=me once CI pass

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=GuillaumeGomez rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 6, 2022

📌 Commit e1f5d4f has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 6, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#101451 (Add incremental test for changing struct name in assoc type.)
 - rust-lang#101468 (fix RPIT ICE for implicit HRTB when missing dyn)
 - rust-lang#101481 (Fix compile errors for uwp-windows-msvc targets)
 - rust-lang#101484 (Remove dead broken code from const zst handling in backends)
 - rust-lang#101486 (Add list of recognized repr attributes to the unrecognized repr error)
 - rust-lang#101488 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#results > table`)
 - rust-lang#101491 (rustdoc: remove outdated CSS `.sub-variant > div > .item-info`)
 - rust-lang#101497 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1bc6110 into rust-lang:master Sep 7, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 7, 2022
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/sub-variant-div-item-info branch September 7, 2022 03:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants