Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OpenCV4 support #308

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

solosito
Copy link

@solosito solosito commented Nov 27, 2019

PR of changes from #288 to ros2 branch

@hgaiser
Copy link
Contributor

hgaiser commented Nov 28, 2019

As mentioned in #259 , we should drop support for OpenCV 2 entirely as it is not a target for melodic and up (and therefore also ROS2) and only makes it more complex and less future proof. In my opinion we should use #259 but it has been ignored for a while now.

@bbferka
Copy link

bbferka commented Feb 14, 2020

Will opening a fourth PR on this topic make it more likely that this fix gets eventually merged? 😄

@OAkyildiz
Copy link

I think @solosito intended these changes for melodic, but it was forked from ros2 and tested with Melodic on Trusty Thar. I see that @mjcarroll labeled this as ros2.

Creating a new pull request with CI test for Melodic/Bionic environment and referring this issue and #288

@mjcarroll mjcarroll self-assigned this Mar 28, 2020
@mjcarroll
Copy link
Contributor

Apologies, I'm going to go ahead and run this through CI targeting foxy and focal

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@mjcarroll
Copy link
Contributor

I'm also in favor of dropping OpenCV2 support as it isn't on any of our target platforms for the foxy release.

@mjcarroll mjcarroll mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2020
@ijnek
Copy link
Member

ijnek commented Sep 4, 2022

I'm going to close this off as I believe it's been resolved in #324.

@ijnek ijnek closed this Sep 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants