Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: send nil as a parameter since this is not in request context #142

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2023

Conversation

mrigesh
Copy link

@mrigesh mrigesh commented Feb 16, 2023

This is to support compatibility with rk-entry PR rookie-ninja/rk-entry#72 , post successful merge of rk-entry, rk-boot needs to be updated with new version of rk-ektry

Signed-off-by: Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigesh.pokhrel@docquity.com>
@mrigesh
Copy link
Author

mrigesh commented Feb 17, 2023

@dongxuny please review

Copy link
Contributor

@dongxuny dongxuny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dongxuny
Copy link
Contributor

@mrigesh Please bump rk-entry version to v2.2.18 in go.mod file which contains your latest commits.

Signed-off-by: Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigesh.pokhrel@docquity.com>
@mrigesh
Copy link
Author

mrigesh commented Feb 20, 2023

@dongxuny done.

@dongxuny dongxuny merged commit 87c9d49 into rookie-ninja:main Feb 20, 2023
@dongxuny
Copy link
Contributor

I will upgrade rk-entry version in rk-xxx family either.

@mrigesh
Copy link
Author

mrigesh commented Feb 20, 2023

@dongxuny thank you. This bump should only affect rk-boot, since it's a breaking change. It should not have any effect on other modules. do let me know if anything has to be done on my side.

@dongxuny
Copy link
Contributor

@mrigesh No problem, I checked other modules, it is good to bump rk-entry version in other module safely. If there is any error occurs while using rk-boot, please upgrade the rk-xxx version. I will finish upgrading rk-xxx module in an hour.

@mrigesh
Copy link
Author

mrigesh commented Feb 20, 2023

@dongxuny awesome. Sounds good.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants