Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(mm-monitoring): revert the code logic but set to disable as delete #151

Merged

Conversation

zdtsw
Copy link

@zdtsw zdtsw commented Dec 5, 2023

ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-293

build 2.4 live: quay.io/wenzhou/rhods-operator-catalog:v2.4.293
build 2.5 live: quay.io/wenzhou/rhods-operator-catalog:v2.5.293 from this PR.

test:

  • install 2.4
    Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-15-30

only have modelmesh enabled
Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-18-00

check resources
Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-18-21

Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-18-35

Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-24-15

  • upgrade to 2.5

Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-30-00

check if resoruce still there
no prometheus CR
Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-31-46
no deployment
Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-31-20

no SA
Screenshot from 2023-12-05 11-31-30

cannot find SerivceMonitor modelmesh-federated-metrics

@zdtsw zdtsw marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2023 10:33
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ import (
var (
ComponentName = "model-mesh"
Path = deploy.DefaultManifestPath + "/" + ComponentName + "/overlays/odh"
monitoringPath = deploy.DefaultManifestPath + "/" + "modelmesh-monitoring/base"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zdtsw Do we need to pull the modelmesh-monitoring manifests in Dockerfile as well?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

@VaishnaviHire VaishnaviHire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants