Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» Wishlist: Developers #3900

Open
kianenigma opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 26 comments
Open

πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» Wishlist: Developers #3900

kianenigma opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 26 comments
Labels
I6-meta A specific issue for grouping tasks or bugs of a specific category.

Comments

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor

kianenigma commented Mar 29, 2024

Counterpart of #3901

Tracking issues for features that make the life of developers of polkadot-sdk easier.

Post your opinion by commenting β€œI wish for <issue-url>” (where β€œ<issue-url>” can be in any repository, not just this) and upvote existing ones by putting a πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on them.

⚠️ Warning: the string in your comment must match the following:

re.compile(r"I wish for:? (https://github\.com/([a-zA-Z0-9_.-]+)/([a-zA-Z0-9_.-]+)/issues/(\d+))")

A single comment can contain multiple wishes.

Ranking

Feature Request Summary Votes Status
#5 Vision for cleaner substrate-node's developer-facing interface 18 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#802 Add ARM binaries to releases 14 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#278 Vision: Redesign Event system 11 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#4947 Remove sequential increment requirements for Child Bounties 10 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#328 Vision: Storage Deposits to be Ergonomic and Automatic 6 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#3594 Subscribe-able runtime apis 6 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#690 Estimate Fees for XCM 6 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#4284 XCM: Remove require_weight_at_most from Transact 5 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#3434 Better delivery fees: DepositFee 3 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#644 Improve XCM debuggability 3 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#486 Runtime API to execute XCM 3 βœ…Closed
#4079 [FRAME] Storage derive macro #[frame_support::stored] 3 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#5298 pallet-assets sufficient assets ED should provide same benefits as DOT ED 3 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#133 Vision: Repository reorganization 2 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#3581 [FRAME] Warn when using default SubstrateWeights in production 2 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#1493 Draft benchmark sanity weight test 2 βœ…Closed
#3672 A time based scheduler 2 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#698 XCM weight meter 2 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#1138 [FRAME] VersionedCall 2 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#349 Encode required origin for extrinsics in metadata 2 πŸ‘Ύ Open
paseo-network/paseo-action-submission#103 Poor DevEx 1 βœ…Closed
#738 XCM executor should use transfer over withdraw/deposit 1 πŸ‘Ύ Open
#273 Improved transaction payment pallet 1 πŸ‘Ύ Open

Last updated: 2024-09-19

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor Author

kianenigma commented Mar 29, 2024

I wish for #5

@kianenigma kianenigma pinned this issue Mar 29, 2024
@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor Author

kianenigma commented Mar 29, 2024

I wish for #133

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor Author

kianenigma commented Mar 29, 2024

I wish for #328

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor Author

kianenigma commented Mar 29, 2024

I wish for #3581

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor Author

kianenigma commented Mar 29, 2024

I wish for #3594

@kianenigma kianenigma added the I6-meta A specific issue for grouping tasks or bugs of a specific category. label Mar 29, 2024
@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor Author

kianenigma commented Apr 2, 2024

I wish for #1493

It will be super useful to make sure parachains don't go to production with bad/dummy weights.

@acatangiu
Copy link
Contributor

I wish for: #690

Cross-consensus XCM asset transfers are complicated with currently no way to know/estimate required fees along the path to the final destination.

@acatangiu
Copy link
Contributor

I wish for: #3434

XCM delivery fees are currently "magically" subtracted from Origins account outside of XCM execution. The XCM program currently has no control over these transport fees. #3434 attempts to improve/fix that.

@Polkadot-Forum
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on Polkadot Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-digest-4-apr-2024/7234/1

@paritytech paritytech deleted a comment from zisequkuai Apr 4, 2024
@ltfschoen
Copy link

I wish for paseo-network/paseo-action-submission#103

@Polkadot-Forum
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on Polkadot Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-summit-24-boosting-the-developer-experience/7202/5

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #644

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #3672

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #698

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #486

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I with for #230

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #738

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #1138

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #273

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #278

@xlc
Copy link
Contributor

xlc commented Apr 8, 2024

I wish for #349

@seadanda
Copy link
Contributor

I wish for #4284

@itsbirdo
Copy link
Member

itsbirdo commented Jul 4, 2024

I wish for #4947

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wish for #4079

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 24, 2024
- Closes paritytech/eng-automation#11

The workflow periodically updates the leaderboards of the wishlist
issues: #3900 and
#3901

The code is adopted from
[here](https://github.com/kianenigma/wishlist-tracker), with slight
modifications.

Previously, the score could be increased by the same person adding
different reactions. Also, some wishes have a score of 0 - even thought
there is a wish for them, because the author was not counted.

Now, the score is a unique count of upvoters of the desired issue,
upvoters of the wish comment, and the author of the wish comment.

I changed the format to include the `Last updated:` at the bottom - it
will be automatically updated.
TarekkMA pushed a commit to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2024
)

- Closes paritytech/eng-automation#11

The workflow periodically updates the leaderboards of the wishlist
issues: paritytech#3900 and
paritytech#3901

The code is adopted from
[here](https://github.com/kianenigma/wishlist-tracker), with slight
modifications.

Previously, the score could be increased by the same person adding
different reactions. Also, some wishes have a score of 0 - even thought
there is a wish for them, because the author was not counted.

Now, the score is a unique count of upvoters of the desired issue,
upvoters of the wish comment, and the author of the wish comment.

I changed the format to include the `Last updated:` at the bottom - it
will be automatically updated.
@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wish for: #802

@acatangiu
Copy link
Contributor

I wish for #5298

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I6-meta A specific issue for grouping tasks or bugs of a specific category.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants