Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: pull everything TSC related #2925

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tjconcept
Copy link
Contributor

Would it make sense to move everything TSC to https://github.com/nodejs/TSC to avoid pollution of this repository?

See nodejs/TSC#1

information about the governance of the Node.js project, see
[GOVERNANCE.md](./GOVERNANCE.md).

### TSC (Technical Steering Committee)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is here for a reason and should not be removed.
What's the sense in having collaborators listed here, but not the TSC?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right. Either this should be left in, or the TSC members should be included in the list of collaborators.

@mscdex mscdex added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Sep 17, 2015
@evanlucas
Copy link
Contributor

I like being able to reference all of the TSC stuff directly in the repo. I also think that including the TSC in the readme is important as that is typically one of the first places a newcomer would look. I'm -1

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Sep 23, 2015

I'm pretty sure this is not going anywhere, sorry @tjconcept

@rvagg rvagg closed this Sep 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants