-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WEB-2001] fix: Issue local cache fixes #5703
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing logging mechanisms, modifying the handling of issue updates, and refining the state management related to issues. Key alterations include the addition of a new field for local updates, updates to logging functions, and the removal of persistent layer updates from certain service methods. The changes aim to improve data handling and maintain consistency between in-memory states and local storage. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
web/core/local-db/utils/tables.ts (1)
22-22
: Consider refining the logging format.The change from
console.log
to the importedlog
function is good for consistency. However, the "#####" prefix in the log statement seems unusual.Consider refining the log statement to provide more context:
- log("#####", sql); + log("Generated SQL for table creation:", sql);This change would make the log output more informative and easier to understand in production logs.
web/core/local-db/utils/load-issues.ts (1)
Clarify and Utilize
is_local_update
ParameterThe
updateIssue
function signature includes theis_local_update: number
parameter, which is being passed in multiple places throughout the codebase. However, it is not utilized within the function body.
- Action Required:
- If
is_local_update
is intended for future functionality:
- Implement its usage within the
updateIssue
function.- Add a TODO comment to indicate pending implementation.
- If
is_local_update
is no longer needed:
- Remove the parameter from the function signature.
- Update all function calls accordingly to eliminate the unused parameter.
Ensuring that all parameters in functions are utilized appropriately helps maintain code clarity and prevents potential bugs.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
46-53
: Approve signature change, but clarify usage ofis_local_update
The function signature has been updated to include
is_local_update: number
, which aligns with the PR objective of addressing local cache issues. However, this new property is not used within the function body.Could you please clarify the intended usage of
is_local_update
? If the implementation is pending, consider adding a TODO comment to explain its future use.To verify the usage of
is_local_update
, let's run the following script:This will help us understand if
is_local_update
is used elsewhere in the codebase or if there are any calls toupdateIssue
that might need updating.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of is_local_update in the codebase # Search for is_local_update usage echo "Searching for is_local_update usage:" rg --type typescript "is_local_update" -C 3 # Search for updateIssue function calls echo "\nSearching for updateIssue function calls:" rg --type typescript "updateIssue\(" -C 3Length of output: 662
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of is_local_update in the codebase # Search for is_local_update usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for is_local_update usage in TypeScript files:" rg "is_local_update" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" -C 3 # Search for updateIssue function calls in .ts and .tsx files echo -e "\nSearching for updateIssue function calls in TypeScript files:" rg "updateIssue\(" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" -C 3Length of output: 43068
web/core/local-db/utils/utils.ts (2)
6-10
: Approve conditional logging with a suggestion for type safetyThe new implementation of the
log
function is a good improvement, allowing for conditional logging based on a debug flag. This change enhances the ability to control logging output between development and production environments.However, to improve type safety, consider defining a custom interface for the
window
object that includes theDEBUG
property. This approach would eliminate the need for theas any
type assertion.Here's a suggested improvement:
interface CustomWindow extends Window { DEBUG?: boolean; } declare let window: CustomWindow; export const log = (...args: any[]) => { if (window.DEBUG) { console.log(...args); } };This change would maintain the functionality while providing better type checking and autocompletion support.
51-51
: Approve the addition ofis_local_update
with a suggestionThe addition of the
is_local_update
property to theupdateIssue
call is a good way to distinguish local updates, which aligns with the PR's objective of fixing local cache issues.For improved clarity and type safety, consider using a boolean value instead of
1
:updateIssue({ ...issuePartial, is_local_update: true });This change would make the intent clearer and be more idiomatic in TypeScript/JavaScript. It would also potentially allow for easier type checking if the
updateIssue
function's parameters are typed.web/core/store/issue/issue.store.ts (2)
88-88
: Consider adding error handling for updatePersistentLayer call.The addition of
updatePersistentLayer(issueId)
is a good improvement for maintaining consistency between the in-memory state and the local database. However, it's important to handle potential errors that might occur during this operation.Consider wrapping the call in a try-catch block to handle any potential errors:
try { updatePersistentLayer(issueId); } catch (error) { console.error(`Failed to update persistent layer for issue ${issueId}:`, error); // Optionally, you could add some error recovery logic here }
101-101
: Consider adding error handling for deleteIssueFromLocal call.The addition of
deleteIssueFromLocal(issueId)
is a good improvement for maintaining consistency between the in-memory state and the local database when removing an issue. However, it's important to handle potential errors that might occur during this operation.Consider wrapping the call in a try-catch block to handle any potential errors:
try { deleteIssueFromLocal(issueId); } catch (error) { console.error(`Failed to delete issue ${issueId} from local storage:`, error); // Optionally, you could add some error recovery logic here }web/core/local-db/utils/query-constructor.ts (3)
123-123
: Approved with suggestions: Consistent logging and clear prefixes.The change from
console.log
to the customlog
function is appropriate. However:
- The prefix "######$$$" is inconsistent with the previous "###". Consider standardizing log prefixes or using log levels for clarity.
- Ensure that SQL query logging is appropriate for all environments, especially considering potential sensitive information.
Consider refactoring the logging approach:
// Define log levels enum LogLevel { DEBUG = 'DEBUG', INFO = 'INFO', WARN = 'WARN', ERROR = 'ERROR' } // Update log function calls log(LogLevel.DEBUG, 'SQL Query:', sql);This approach provides more structure and allows for easier filtering and management of logs.
152-152
: Consistent replacement, but logging approach needs standardization.This change aligns with the previous replacements of
console.log
with the customlog
function. However, the inconsistency in log prefixes ("$$$" here vs. "###" and "######$$$" elsewhere) reinforces the need for a standardized logging approach.To improve consistency and maintainability, consider implementing a structured logging system:
- Define an enum for log levels.
- Create a logging utility that includes both the log level and a descriptive tag.
Example:
enum LogLevel { DEBUG = 'DEBUG', INFO = 'INFO', WARN = 'WARN', ERROR = 'ERROR' } function logQuery(level: LogLevel, tag: string, sql: string) { log(`[${level}] [${tag}] SQL Query:`, sql); } // Usage logQuery(LogLevel.DEBUG, 'ISSUE_FILTER', sql);This approach would provide consistent, easily filterable logs across the application.
Line range hint
1-170
: Summary of review findings and recommendations
The changes consistently replace
console.log
with a customlog
function, which is a good practice for better logging control.There are inconsistencies in log message prefixes ("###", "######$$$", "$$$") which should be standardized for better log management and filtering.
The file contains complex SQL query construction logic. Consider adding comments or documentation to improve maintainability.
The changes don't directly address the PR objectives mentioned in the description (local cache fixes, rendering of issue titles, escaping single quotes). Ensure that these objectives are met in other files or clarify the PR description if the objectives have changed.
Logging of SQL queries might expose sensitive information. Review the logging strategy to ensure it's appropriate for all environments.
Recommendations:
- Implement a structured logging system with defined log levels and consistent tagging.
- Review and document the SQL query construction logic to improve maintainability.
- Ensure that the PR objectives are met or update the PR description if the scope has changed.
- Review the overall logging strategy, especially for sensitive information like SQL queries.
web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-453
: Summary: Improved local cache managementThe changes in this file consistently remove
updatePersistentLayer
calls from individual issue operations while retaining sync calls for bulk operations. This approach aligns well with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues and should lead to more consistent and reliable local cache management.Consider the following recommendations:
- Implement a centralized cache update mechanism that can be triggered after API operations, replacing the need for individual
updatePersistentLayer
calls.- Add comprehensive logging for cache sync operations to aid in debugging and performance monitoring.
- Consider implementing a background sync mechanism to periodically reconcile the local cache with the server state, further improving reliability.
To help with implementation, here's a script to identify all cache-related operations in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Search for cache-related operations rg "cache|persist|sync|updatePersistentLayer" --type typescriptThis will help in identifying areas where the new centralized cache update mechanism should be applied.
web/core/store/issue/issue-details/sub_issues.store.ts (3)
184-185
: LGTM: Updating persistent layer after creating sub-issuesThe addition of
updatePersistentLayer
call after creating sub-issues ensures that the local cache is updated to reflect these changes. This aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this call for better code readability:
+ // Update local cache to reflect the newly created sub-issues updatePersistentLayer([parentIssueId, ...issueIds]);
282-283
: LGTM: Updating persistent layer after removing a sub-issueThe addition of
updatePersistentLayer
call after removing a sub-issue ensures that the local cache is updated to reflect this change. This aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.For consistency with the
createSubIssues
method, consider adding a brief comment:+ // Update local cache to reflect the removal of the sub-issue updatePersistentLayer([parentIssueId]);
317-318
: LGTM: Updating persistent layer after deleting a sub-issueThe addition of
updatePersistentLayer
call after deleting a sub-issue ensures that the local cache is updated to reflect this change. This aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Consider the following suggestions for improved consistency and code reusability:
- Add a brief comment for consistency:
+ // Update local cache to reflect the deletion of the sub-issue updatePersistentLayer([parentIssueId]);
- Since this implementation is identical to the
removeSubIssue
method, consider extracting this functionality into a private method to avoid code duplication:private updatePersistentLayerForParent(parentIssueId: string) { // Update local cache to reflect changes in sub-issues updatePersistentLayer([parentIssueId]); }Then, you can call this method in both
removeSubIssue
anddeleteSubIssue
:this.updatePersistentLayerForParent(parentIssueId);This refactoring will improve code maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies between these similar operations.
web/core/store/issue/helpers/base-issues.store.ts (2)
Line range hint
516-535
: Approved: Enhancement to update persistent layer after issue creation.The addition of
updatePersistentLayer(response.id)
after creating an issue is a good improvement, likely enhancing data consistency or offline functionality.Consider wrapping this call in a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully:
async createIssue( workspaceSlug: string, projectId: string, data: Partial<TIssue>, id?: string, shouldUpdateList = true ) { const response = await this.issueService.createIssue(workspaceSlug, projectId, data); this.addIssue(response, shouldUpdateList); shouldUpdateList && (await this.fetchParentStats(workspaceSlug, projectId)); - updatePersistentLayer(response.id); + try { + await updatePersistentLayer(response.id); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to update persistent layer:", error); + // Consider adding more robust error handling or reporting here + } return response; }This change would ensure that any errors in updating the persistent layer don't break the issue creation process while still logging the error for debugging purposes.
Line range hint
1-1158
: Consider strategies to improve maintainability.While the
BaseIssuesStore
class is well-structured, its length and complexity might pose challenges for long-term maintenance. Consider the following suggestions to improve maintainability:
Split the class into smaller, more focused classes or modules. For example, you could separate concerns like issue creation, updating, and list management into distinct classes.
Use composition over inheritance where possible. This could involve creating separate service classes for different functionalities and injecting them into the main store.
Implement more extensive unit testing to ensure the reliability of individual methods and make refactoring easier in the future.
Consider using the Command pattern for complex operations, which could help in organizing and potentially undoing operations.
Review the use of MobX and consider if some of the complexity could be reduced by leveraging more of its features or by using a different state management approach.
These are high-level suggestions and would require careful consideration and planning before implementation. The current structure is not necessarily problematic if it meets the current needs of the project effectively.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- web/core/components/issues/title-input.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/storage.sqlite.ts (9 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/utils/load-issues.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/utils/query-constructor.ts (5 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/utils/schemas.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/utils/tables.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/local-db/utils/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (1 hunks)
- web/core/store/issue/helpers/base-issues.store.ts (2 hunks)
- web/core/store/issue/issue-details/sub_issues.store.ts (4 hunks)
- web/core/store/issue/issue.store.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (28)
web/core/local-db/utils/tables.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-41
: Verify alignment with PR objectives.While the logging improvements in this file are valuable for debugging, they don't directly address the specific issues mentioned in the PR description (rendering of issue title, last updated time query, escaping single quotes in dynamic query).
To ensure all objectives are met, let's verify the presence of changes related to the mentioned issues:
If these checks don't reveal relevant changes, please ensure that all PR objectives are addressed in other files or consider updating the PR description to accurately reflect the changes made.
web/core/local-db/utils/schemas.ts (1)
35-35
: LGTM! Verify usage across the codebase.The addition of the
is_local_update
field to theissueSchema
is consistent with the existing schema structure and aligns with the PR objectives related to local cache fixes. The field type "INTEGER" is appropriate for a boolean-like value, following the convention used in other similar fields (e.g.,is_draft
).To ensure this change is properly integrated, please verify its usage across the codebase:
This script will help identify areas of the codebase that might need updates to accommodate the new
is_local_update
field.✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete:
is_local_update
field is consistently integrated across the codebase.No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the new 'is_local_update' field # Search for direct references to 'is_local_update' echo "Searching for direct references to 'is_local_update':" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'is_local_update' # Search for SQL queries that might need updating echo "\nSearching for SQL queries that might need updating:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'INSERT INTO issues|UPDATE issues' # Search for any issue-related operations that might need to consider the new field echo "\nSearching for issue-related operations:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'createIssue|updateIssue|getIssue'Length of output: 646
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the new 'is_local_update' field # Search for direct references to 'is_local_update' echo "Searching for direct references to 'is_local_update':" rg 'is_local_update' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.js' # Search for SQL queries that might need updating echo "\nSearching for SQL queries that might need updating:" rg 'INSERT INTO issues|UPDATE issues' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.js' # Search for any issue-related operations that might need to consider the new field echo "\nSearching for issue-related operations:" rg 'createIssue|updateIssue|getIssue' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.js'Length of output: 36118
web/core/local-db/utils/load-issues.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-117
: Overall assessment of changesThe changes in this file successfully address two of the three PR objectives:
- The modification of the
updateIssue
function signature prepares for potential local cache fixes.- The escaping of single quotes in
stageIssueInserts
improves query security.However, there's no apparent change addressing the "Rendering of Issue Title" objective mentioned in the PR summary. This might be implemented in another file or could be missing from this PR.
To further improve the code:
- Consider implementing a more robust SQL query builder or an ORM to handle database operations securely and efficiently.
- Add comprehensive error handling and logging throughout these database operations to facilitate debugging and improve reliability.
- If not already present, implement unit tests for these functions to ensure their correctness and prevent regressions.
To ensure we haven't missed any relevant changes, let's run a final verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any mentions of issue title rendering in the codebase echo "Searching for issue title rendering related code:" rg --type typescript "issue.*title.*render" -C 3 echo "\nSearching for changes related to line breaks in titles:" rg --type typescript "title.*(\n|\\n|line.*break)" -C 3This will help us locate any code related to issue title rendering that might be relevant to the PR objectives but not present in this file.
85-88
: Approve single quote escaping, but suggest using parameterized queriesThe changes correctly address the PR objective of "Escaping Single Quotes in Dynamic Query" by replacing single quotes with two single quotes. This improves security by preventing SQL injection vulnerabilities.
However, the function is still using string concatenation to build the SQL query, which can be vulnerable to SQL injection if not all inputs are properly sanitized. Consider refactoring this function to use parameterized queries for better security. Here's a suggested approach:
- Use a prepared statement with placeholders for values.
- Pass the values as parameters to the query execution.
Example refactor:
const columns = Object.keys(sanitizedIssue).join(','); const placeholders = Object.keys(sanitizedIssue).map(() => '?').join(','); const values = Object.values(sanitizedIssue).map(value => value === null ? '' : typeof value === 'object' ? JSON.stringify(value) : value ); const query = `INSERT OR REPLACE INTO issues (${columns}) VALUES (${placeholders});`; persistence.db.run(query, values);This approach eliminates the need for manual escaping and provides better protection against SQL injection.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, we should verify the usage of
stageIssueInserts
across the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of stageIssueInserts in the codebase echo "Searching for stageIssueInserts usage:" rg --type typescript "stageIssueInserts" -C 3This will help us understand if there are any other parts of the code that might need to be updated along with this change.
web/core/local-db/utils/utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-124
: Summary of changes and suggestionsThe changes in this file effectively address the PR objectives related to local cache fixes. The modifications to the logging functions and the
updatePersistentLayer
function are well-implemented and contribute to improved debugging capabilities and clearer distinction of local updates.Key points:
- The new conditional logging in the
log
function is a good improvement.- The addition of
logError
andlogInfo
functions provides consistency.- The
is_local_update
flag inupdatePersistentLayer
helps distinguish local updates.Suggestions for further improvement:
- Enhance type safety for the
DEBUG
flag access.- Apply conditional logging to
logError
andlogInfo
for consistency.- Use a boolean value for
is_local_update
instead of1
.These changes, along with the suggested improvements, will contribute to a more robust and maintainable codebase.
web/core/store/issue/issue.store.ts (2)
10-11
: LGTM: New imports for local database operations.The new import statements for
deleteIssueFromLocal
andupdatePersistentLayer
are correctly added and align with the changes made in the class methods. These imports support the new functionality for synchronizing the in-memory state with the local database.
Line range hint
1-134
: Summary: Improved local cache synchronization with room for error handling enhancement.The changes in this file successfully address the PR objective of fixing local cache issues. The additions of
updatePersistentLayer
anddeleteIssueFromLocal
calls ensure better synchronization between the in-memory state and local storage for issue updates and deletions.Key improvements:
- Consistent state management between memory and local storage.
- Proper handling of issue updates and deletions in the local cache.
Suggestion for further improvement:
- Implement error handling for the new method calls to enhance robustness and reliability.
Overall, these changes contribute positively to the stability and consistency of the local cache system.
web/core/components/issues/title-input.tsx (1)
103-103
: Approved: Improved rendering of disabled issue titlesThe addition of the
whitespace-pre-line
class to the disabled state div is a good solution for preserving line breaks in issue titles. This change directly addresses the PR objective of fixing the issue title rendering when the feature is disabled.Benefits of this change:
- Improves readability of multi-line issue titles
- Preserves the original formatting of the title
- Implements the fix using a simple, built-in CSS property
This change effectively solves the problem without introducing any apparent negative side effects or performance issues.
web/core/local-db/utils/query-constructor.ts (2)
9-9
: LGTM: Import of custom log function.The import of the custom
log
function is correctly placed and aligns with the changes described in the AI summary.
67-67
: Consistent replacement of console.log.This change is consistent with the previous log replacement. The same considerations regarding logging practices apply here as well.
web/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts (8)
Line range hint
302-309
: LGTM: Streamlined issue link creationThe removal of
updatePersistentLayer
call is consistent with the changes in other methods and aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Please verify that this change doesn't affect the immediate visibility of newly created issue links in the UI. Consider testing the following scenarios:
- Creating an issue link and verifying its immediate appearance in the related issues section.
- Checking if any real-time updates or WebSocket notifications related to issue links are affected.
Run the following script to identify any UI components or services that might be affected:
#!/bin/bash # Search for issue link related UI components and services rg "issueLink|issue link|related issue" --type typescript --type vue --type react
Line range hint
323-330
: LGTM: Streamlined issue link deletion processThe removal of
updatePersistentLayer
call is consistent with the changes in other methods and aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Please verify that this change doesn't affect the immediate removal of deleted issue links from the UI. Consider testing the following scenarios:
- Deleting an issue link and verifying its immediate disappearance from the related issues section.
- Checking if any real-time updates or WebSocket notifications related to issue link deletions are affected.
Run the following script to identify any UI components or services that might be affected by issue link deletions:
#!/bin/bash # Search for issue link deletion related UI components and services rg "deleteIssueLink|remove issue link|delete related issue" --type typescript --type vue --type react
Line range hint
311-321
: LGTM: Simplified issue link update processThe removal of
updatePersistentLayer
call is consistent with the changes in other methods and aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Please verify that this change doesn't affect the immediate visibility of updated issue links in the UI. Consider testing the following scenarios:
- Updating an existing issue link and verifying the immediate reflection of changes in the related issues section.
- Checking if any real-time updates or WebSocket notifications related to issue link updates are affected.
Run the following script to identify any UI components or services that might be affected by issue link updates:
#!/bin/bash # Search for issue link update related UI components and services rg "updateIssueLink|update issue link|modify related issue" --type typescript --type vue --type react
Line range hint
332-341
: LGTM: Maintained sync for bulk operationsThe retention of
persistence.syncIssues(projectId)
call for bulk operations is appropriate. This ensures that multiple issue changes are properly reflected in the local cache, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Please verify the effectiveness of the sync operation after bulk operations. Consider testing the following scenarios:
- Perform a bulk operation (e.g., status change for multiple issues) and verify that all affected issues are immediately updated in the UI.
- Check if the sync operation causes any noticeable delay in the UI for large bulk operations.
Run the following script to identify any other bulk operation methods that might need similar sync calls:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other bulk operation methods rg "bulk.*operation|mass.*update" --type typescript
Line range hint
343-355
: LGTM: Maintained sync for bulk issue deletionsThe retention of
persistence.syncIssues(projectId)
call for bulk issue deletions is appropriate. This ensures that the removal of multiple issues is properly reflected in the local cache, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Please verify the effectiveness of the sync operation after bulk deletions. Consider testing the following scenarios:
- Perform a bulk deletion of issues and verify that all deleted issues are immediately removed from the UI.
- Check if the sync operation causes any noticeable delay in the UI for large bulk deletions.
- Verify that any related data (e.g., issue relations, sub-issues) is also properly updated after bulk deletions.
Run the following script to identify any UI components or services that might be affected by bulk issue deletions:
#!/bin/bash # Search for bulk deletion related UI components and services rg "bulkDelete|mass delete|remove multiple issues" --type typescript --type vue --type react
Line range hint
26-30
: LGTM: Simplified issue creation processThe removal of
updatePersistentLayer
call aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues. This change simplifies the method and may help avoid inconsistencies in the local cache.Please verify that no functionality dependent on immediate local cache updates after issue creation is affected. Run the following script to check for any other uses of
updatePersistentLayer
in the codebase:✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Simplified issue creation process
The removal of
updatePersistentLayer
call inweb/core/services/issue/issue.service.ts
aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues. No remaining calls toupdatePersistentLayer
found within this file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining uses of updatePersistentLayer rg "updatePersistentLayer" --type typescriptLength of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining uses of updatePersistentLayer in TypeScript files rg "updatePersistentLayer" --type tsLength of output: 952
Line range hint
279-286
: LGTM: Simplified sub-issue creation processThe removal of
updatePersistentLayer
call is consistent with the changes in other methods and aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Please verify that this change doesn't affect the immediate visibility of newly created sub-issues in the UI. Consider testing the following scenarios:
- Creating a sub-issue and verifying its immediate appearance in the parent issue's sub-issue list.
- Checking if any real-time updates or WebSocket notifications related to sub-issues are affected.
Run the following script to identify any UI components or services that might be affected:
Line range hint
265-270
: LGTM: Consistent approach to issue updatesThe removal of
updatePersistentLayer
call is consistent with the changes in other methods and aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.Please verify that this change doesn't negatively impact real-time updates in the UI. Consider running UI tests or manually testing issue update scenarios to ensure smooth user experience. Also, check if there are any WebSocket or other real-time update mechanisms that might need adjustment:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Consistent approach to issue updates
The removal of the
updatePersistentLayer
call is consistent with the changes in other methods and aligns with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for WebSocket or real-time update related code rg "WebSocket|real-time|live update" --type typescriptLength of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for WebSocket or real-time update related code in TypeScript, Vue, and React files rg "WebSocket|real-time|live update" --type typescript --type vue --type reactLength of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for WebSocket or real-time update related code in TypeScript, Vue, and React files using file extensions rg "WebSocket|real-time|live update" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" --glob "*.vue" --glob "*.jsx" --glob "*.js"Length of output: 596
web/core/store/issue/issue-details/sub_issues.store.ts (2)
16-16
: LGTM: Import statement for updatePersistentLayerThe addition of this import statement is necessary for the local cache fixes mentioned in the PR objectives. It allows the use of the
updatePersistentLayer
function to update the persistent layer after certain operations on sub-issues.
Line range hint
1-348
: Overall assessment: Local cache updates for sub-issue operationsThe changes made in this file consistently implement updates to the persistent layer (local cache) after operations on sub-issues (create, remove, delete). These modifications align well with the PR objective of fixing local cache issues.
Key points:
- The
updatePersistentLayer
function is imported and used appropriately.- The persistent layer is updated after creating, removing, and deleting sub-issues.
- The implementation ensures that the local cache remains in sync with the sub-issue operations.
These changes should improve the reliability and consistency of the local cache in relation to sub-issue management.
web/core/local-db/storage.sqlite.ts (7)
92-92
: LGTM: Consistent use of new logging function.The replacement of
console.info
withlogInfo
aligns with the new logging approach, improving consistency and manageability of logs.
Line range hint
106-106
: LGTM: Consistent use of new logging function.The replacement of
console.log
withlog
aligns with the new logging approach, improving consistency and manageability of logs.
179-179
: LGTM: Consistent use of new error logging function.The replacement of
console.error
withlogError
aligns with the new logging approach, maintaining crucial error logging capability while improving consistency and manageability of logs.
185-188
: LGTM: Consistent use of new logging functions.The replacement of
console.log
withlog
andconsole.info
withlogInfo
aligns with the new logging approach, improving consistency and manageability of logs throughout the_syncIssues
method.
271-271
: LGTM: Consistent use of new logging function.The replacement of
console.log
withlog
in thegetIssues
method aligns with the new logging approach, improving consistency and manageability of logs.Also applies to: 308-308, 327-327
Line range hint
1-427
: Summary of changes and their impact
- New logging functions have been introduced and consistently applied throughout the file, improving log management and filtering capabilities.
- The
getLastUpdatedIssue
method now filters out local updates, addressing one of the PR objectives.These changes enhance the code quality and align with the PR objectives. However, please ensure to run the suggested verification steps to confirm that:
- All direct console calls have been replaced with the new logging functions.
- The change in the
getLastUpdatedIssue
method doesn't negatively impact other parts of the application.Overall, these modifications improve the consistency and functionality of the local cache system.
253-253
: Verify the impact of filtering out local updates.The addition of
AND is_local_update IS NULL
to the query aligns with the PR objective to fix the last updated time query. This change filters out local updates when retrieving the last updated issue.To ensure this change doesn't unintentionally affect other parts of the application, please run the following script to check for other usages of the
getLastUpdatedIssue
method:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of getLastUpdatedIssue method to ensure the change doesn't affect other parts of the application. # Test: Search for getLastUpdatedIssue method calls. Expect: List of method calls to review manually. rg --type typescript 'getLastUpdatedIssue'Please review the results to confirm that this change is appropriate for all use cases of the
getLastUpdatedIssue
method.web/core/store/issue/helpers/base-issues.store.ts (1)
34-34
: New import added for persistent layer update.The addition of
updatePersistentLayer
from@/local-db/utils/utils
is likely related to the changes in thecreateIssue
method mentioned in the AI summary. This import suggests an enhancement in how the application handles data persistence.
@@ -11,14 +11,15 @@ import { | |||
memberSchema, | |||
optionsSchema, | |||
} from "./schemas"; | |||
import { log } from "./utils"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining console.log
statements found.
While the centralized log
function is implemented, several console.log
calls still exist across the codebase:
-
Local-DB Directory:
./web/core/local-db/utils/utils.ts
./web/core/local-db/utils/indexes.ts
-
Stores and Services:
./web/core/store/project/project.store.ts
./web/core/services/file.service.ts
-
Helpers and Components:
./web/helpers/string.helper.ts
./web/core/components/...
Please replace these console.log
statements with the centralized log
function to ensure consistent logging practices.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve the addition of centralized logging utility.
The introduction of a centralized log
function from ./utils
is a good practice for maintaining consistent logging across the application.
To ensure this change is implemented consistently, let's verify the log
function's implementation and its usage across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the `log` function
# Test 1: Check the implementation of the `log` function
echo "Checking the implementation of the log function:"
rg --type typescript 'export (const|function) log' ./web/core/local-db/utils/
# Test 2: Check for any remaining direct console.log calls in the local-db directory
echo "Checking for any remaining direct console.log calls in the local-db directory:"
rg --type typescript 'console\.log' ./web/core/local-db/
# Test 3: Check the usage of the new log function across the codebase
echo "Checking the usage of the new log function across the codebase:"
rg --type typescript 'log\(' ./web/
Length of output: 692
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the `log` function without using --type flag
# Test 1: Check the implementation of the `log` function
echo "Checking the implementation of the log function:"
rg 'export (const|function) log' ./web/core/local-db/utils/ --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'
# Test 2: Check for any remaining direct console.log calls in the local-db directory
echo "Checking for any remaining direct console.log calls in the local-db directory:"
rg 'console\.log' ./web/core/local-db/ --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'
# Test 3: Check the usage of the new log function across the codebase
echo "Checking the usage of the new log function across the codebase:"
rg 'log\(' ./web/ --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'
Length of output: 4700
export const logError = console.error; | ||
export const logInfo = console.info; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider applying conditional logging to logError
and logInfo
The addition of logError
and logInfo
functions provides a consistent interface for different types of logging. However, unlike the log
function, these new functions do not implement conditional logging based on the DEBUG flag.
For consistency and to have better control over all types of logging, consider applying the same conditional logic to these functions:
export const logError = (...args: any[]) => {
if (window.DEBUG) {
console.error(...args);
}
};
export const logInfo = (...args: any[]) => {
if (window.DEBUG) {
console.info(...args);
}
};
This change would ensure that all logging functions behave consistently and can be controlled via the DEBUG flag, which is particularly useful when transitioning between development and production environments.
@@ -47,7 +48,7 @@ export const issueFilterQueryConstructor = (workspaceSlug: string, projectId: st | |||
|
|||
`; | |||
|
|||
console.log("###", sql); | |||
log("###", sql); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Inconsistent Logging Practices Across the Codebase
The shell script analysis revealed multiple instances of console.log
remaining in various TypeScript files within the web/
directory. To ensure consistent and secure logging, it's recommended to replace all console.log
statements with the custom log
function. This will help in managing logs effectively and prevent potential exposure of sensitive information.
Affected Files:
web/helpers/string.helper.ts
web/core/store/project/project.store.ts
web/core/services/file.service.ts
web/core/store/cycle.store.ts
web/core/local-db/storage.sqlite.ts
web/core/local-db/utils/utils.ts
web/core/local-db/utils/indexes.ts
web/core/hooks/use-multiple-select.ts
web/core/components/workspace/sidebar/favorites/favorites-menu.tsx
web/core/components/workspace/settings/member-columns.tsx
web/core/components/project/settings/member-columns.tsx
web/core/components/project/member-list-item.tsx
web/core/components/project-states/create-update/form.tsx
web/app/installations/[provider]/page.tsx
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Replaced console.log with custom log function.
The change is consistent with the described modifications. However, consider the following:
- Ensure that the custom
log
function handles sensitive information appropriately. - Review if logging SQL queries is necessary in production environments.
- Consider using log levels (e.g., debug, info, warn) instead of prefixes like "###" for better log management.
To verify logging practices, run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other instances of console.log and log function usage
rg --type typescript 'console\.log|log\(' web/
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other instances of console.log and log function usage in TypeScript files
rg 'console\.log|log\(' web/ --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' --type typescript
Length of output: 3722
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ | |||
import { issueFilterCountQueryConstructor, issueFilterQueryConstructor } from "./utils/query-constructor"; | |||
import { runQuery } from "./utils/query-executor"; | |||
import { createTables } from "./utils/tables"; | |||
import { getGroupedIssueResults, getSubGroupedIssueResults } from "./utils/utils"; | |||
import { logError, getGroupedIssueResults, getSubGroupedIssueResults, logInfo, log } from "./utils/utils"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Direct console calls detected.
The verification script found multiple direct console.log
, console.error
, and console.warn
calls that should be replaced with the new logging functions to maintain consistent log management.
Examples of affected files:
web/app/workspace-invitations/page.tsx
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/root.tsx
web/helpers/string.helper.ts
packages/editor/src/core/plugins/image/restore-image.ts
admin/app/authentication/github/form.tsx
- (and many others as listed in the script output)
Please refactor these instances to use the appropriate logging functions (logError
, logInfo
, log
) from ./utils/utils
to ensure consistency and improve log management across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Improved logging imports.
The introduction of specific logging functions (logError
, logInfo
, log
) is a good practice for better log management and filtering.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any remaining direct console calls that should be replaced:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for direct console calls that should be replaced with new logging functions.
# Test: Search for direct console calls. Expect: No results or only intentional direct console calls.
rg --type typescript 'console\.(log|error|info|warn)'
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for direct console calls that should be replaced with new logging functions.
# Test: Search for direct console calls in TypeScript files. Expect: No results or only intentional direct console calls.
rg --type ts 'console\.(log|error|info|warn)'
Length of output: 21289
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
is_local_update
to track local updates in issue management.Bug Fixes
Chores