Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding service account support #1812

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 21, 2023

Conversation

nitishchauhan0022
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

Added the support for additon of service account from the func cli

Fixes #1439

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 12, 2023
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from dsimansk and rhuss June 12, 2023 09:20
Signed-off-by: ntishchauhan0022 <nitishchauhan0022@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 59.45% and project coverage change: -2.20 ⚠️

Comparison is base (c1a90f6) 62.66% compared to head (0a018c0) 60.47%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1812      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.66%   60.47%   -2.20%     
==========================================
  Files         106      107       +1     
  Lines       13640    13658      +18     
==========================================
- Hits         8547     8259     -288     
- Misses       4294     4621     +327     
+ Partials      799      778      -21     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-test 37.33% <59.45%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
e2e-test-oncluster 32.93% <54.05%> (-0.14%) ⬇️
e2e-test-oncluster-runtime 28.19% <48.64%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-go 26.99% <54.05%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-node 28.09% <54.05%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-python 28.09% <54.05%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus 28.21% <54.05%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot 27.14% <54.05%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-typescript 28.21% <54.05%> (?)
integration-tests ?
unit-tests-macos-latest 49.61% <48.64%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
unit-tests-ubuntu-latest 50.38% <48.64%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
unit-tests-windows-latest 49.60% <48.64%> (-0.08%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/k8s/serviceaccount.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/knative/deployer.go 60.84% <44.44%> (-3.42%) ⬇️
cmd/deploy.go 74.79% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️

... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@lance
Copy link
Member

lance commented Jun 13, 2023

/override integration-tests-latest-release_func_main
/override unit-tests_func_main
/override unit-tests_func_main

@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Jun 13, 2023

@lance: Overrode contexts on behalf of lance: integration-tests-latest-release_func_main, unit-tests_func_main

In response to this:

/override integration-tests-latest-release_func_main
/override unit-tests_func_main
/override unit-tests_func_main

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@lance
Copy link
Member

lance commented Jun 13, 2023

Hi @nitishchauhan0022 thanks for this! Can you please run gofmt -s and also update docs/reference/func_yaml.md? Thanks!

Signed-off-by: ntishchauhan0022 <nitishchauhan0022@gmail.com>
@nitishchauhan0022
Copy link
Contributor Author

nitishchauhan0022 commented Jun 15, 2023

hey @lance I have formatted the files correctly and func_yaml.md will be rebased as you mentioned.

Copy link
Member

@lkingland lkingland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

CC @jrangelramos would an E2E test be difficult for this one?

/hold for other 👀

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 19, 2023
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 19, 2023
@matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

@nitishchauhan0022 please rebase.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 19, 2023
…tion

Signed-off-by: Matej Vasek <mvasek@redhat.com>
@knative-prow knative-prow bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 20, 2023
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 20, 2023
@matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 20, 2023
@matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

matejvasek commented Jun 20, 2023

@nitishchauhan0022 please rebase.

I did merge main into this PR.

@matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

@matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

PTAL @saschagrunert

@nitishchauhan0022
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nitishchauhan0022 please rebase.

I did merge main into this PR.

Thank you @matejvasek for doing this. I was away for couple of days.

@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Jun 21, 2023

@saschagrunert: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Jun 21, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lkingland, matejvasek, nitishchauhan0022, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [lkingland,matejvasek]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

/unhold

@knative-prow knative-prow bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 21, 2023
@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit f93b232 into knative:main Jun 21, 2023
38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Defining serviceaccount for the function
6 participants