[4.0] Replace filter.condition by filter.published in com_content

[chmst]

Started here #30459 .

Summary of Changes

In com_content and related modules, filter.condition is used for filtering publishedm unpublished, archived, trashed data.
This might cause problems when 3rd party extension set filters for articles.
This PR sets back the name to filter.published in J3. It does not change the behavour in any way.

Testing Instructions

Testing is not as easy, as these filters are used in different ways. The test is successful, if nothing in Joomla frontend changes with the patch applied.

You should have some content i.e. testing sample data - categories and articles, some archived, some published, some unpublished and some trashed.
And you should have modules for every kind of articles.

Now check in the frontend: The modules must show only published articles. Your blogs should show only published articles.

[ghost]

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 01c7762

---

_{This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/30467.}

[Quy]

Remove?

joomla-cms/modules/mod_articles_latest/src/Helper/ArticlesLatestHelper.php

Line 69 in 54d78e9

$model->setState('filter.condition', 1);

See:

joomla-cms/modules/mod_articles_latest/src/Helper/ArticlesLatestHelper.php

Line 52 in 54d78e9

$model->setState('filter.published', 1);

[karo3]

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 01c7762

---

_{This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/30467.}

[richard67]

@chmst Could you check @Quy 's comment above? Thanks in advance.

[chmst]

@Quy could you please remove the "update request" label from this PR, as the requested changes are made in #31155?

[richard67]

Previous test results are still valid since last commit was only a clean branch update => RTC.

---

_{This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/30467.}

[richard67]

Good to be merged .. I just gave it a test, too.

[richard67]

Thanks!