-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: eliminate raw-types and remove unnecessary cast #1095
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0e75338
fix(deps): update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-shared-dep…
renovate-bot ee5d7a5
chore(deps): update dependency kr.motd.maven:os-maven-plugin to v1.7.…
renovate-bot 4fd1f98
fix: eliminate raw-types and remove unnecessary cast
burkedavison 29ca198
fix(spring): eliminate raw-types and remove unnecessary cast
burkedavison c83a887
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fix-raw-types' into fix-raw-types
burkedavison 49a3ad9
Merge branch 'main' into fix-raw-types
burkedavison 51dbc29
Merge branch 'autoconfig-gen-draft2' into fix-raw-types
burkedavison File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we change
<? extends T>
toT
as well? Looks like what gets returned are always the same type?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
T
is valid for the current source; but as aUtil
function, the limit of the implementation is<? extends T>
which defines how it can be used in the future as well. This also decouples future functions from needing to return the same type of AstNode list.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For example, without the
? extends T
, it wouldn't be possible to combine type-related-but-not-the-same helper functions:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the general idea. But for this util method, it's a very specific use case(Create retry settings with some hardcoded method names) that is only used by the two composers, so I doubt it will be used by anything else. I could also argue that this method should not be a public Util, maybe it should be in something like a
AbstractSpringComposer
with default scope.That being said, I don't think this is critical enough to block the PR, so either way works.