Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

This removes gambit-enumpoly from the default build and marks as expe… #397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

This removes gambit-enumpoly from the default build and marks as expe… #397

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2023

Commits on Nov 1, 2023

  1. This removes gambit-enumpoly from the default build and marks as expe… 

    …rimental.

The implementation of gambit-enumpoly has a number of problems which have cumulated over the years, possibly related to building pelican on 64-bit systems.

The roadmap calls for this method to be refactored heavily to separate out the concept of support enumeration from solution method, and to allow for different solution backends for given candidate supports.

As such, for now, we are doing the following:

1.  This method is now marked as "experimental" and removed from the build by default.
2.  References to it in the graphical interface have been removed.  (It was never the "recommended" solver so this has little effect unless someone was selecting it explicitly.)
    @tturocy
    tturocy committed Nov 1, 2023
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    a931581 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history