Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Monitoring] Refactor index patterns from configurable to constants #29528

Merged

Conversation

chrisronline
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisronline chrisronline commented Jan 29, 2019

Resolves #28958

Per the issue, we don't really want to expose monitoring index patterns as configurable, even though we technically do (but don't document it). We have a chance in 7.0 to make a technical breaking change by removing this ability so here we go!

"Release Note: Historically, configuring monitoring index patterns was possible, but undocumented. Moving forward, it will be detrimental to any users changing these from their defaults so the ability to configure these is no longer available. All configuration for xpack.monitoring.*.index_pattern are now ignored."

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/stack-monitoring

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Build Failed

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Copy link
Contributor

@ycombinator ycombinator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left one minor comment. Otherwise LGTM.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

@chrisronline chrisronline merged commit c443fee into elastic:master Jan 30, 2019
@chrisronline chrisronline deleted the monitoring/index_pattern_constants branch January 30, 2019 20:21
@gchaps
Copy link
Contributor

gchaps commented Feb 11, 2019

@chrisronline Can you please update the breaking changes doc and include this issue?

@chrisronline
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gchaps My bad! #30710

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants