You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now the label argument is a keyword argument with a default of either 0 or 1, depending on the method.
Doesn't it make more sense to always ask the user which class they want an explanation for instead of assuming one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm thinking that refactoring the classes into more specific ones that also mention what task they do, so e.g. LimeImageClassifier ([name][modality][task]) as mentioned in #91 (comment), would also support this way of working. It should immediately be clear from the name Classifier that a class to explain must be provided. Similarly, for possible other tasks in the future, other arguments may be clear (e.g. a distance metric when you want to explain distance).
Now the
label
argument is a keyword argument with a default of either 0 or 1, depending on the method.Doesn't it make more sense to always ask the user which class they want an explanation for instead of assuming one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: