-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't use uninitialized edm::Handle in TrackstersProducer #31031
Conversation
Dereferencing an uninitialized edm::Handle leads to dereference of a nullptr which is undefined behavior. Rearranged code to avoid using edm::Handles at all.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31031/17523
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoHGCal/TICL @perrotta, @jpata, @kpedro88, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
-1 Tested at: a7efd7a CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-03-1100 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: AddOn
I found errors in the following addon tests: cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week0/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-03-1100/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_GRun.py realData=False globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Mon Aug 3 22:22:08 2020-date Mon Aug 3 21:59:55 2020 s - exit: 16640 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: |
Comparison job queued. |
Some differences in the comparison test are expected from #30999 (comment) |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
ping @kpedro88 |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Dereferencing an uninitialized edm::Handle leads to dereference of a nullptr which is undefined behavior. Rearranged code to avoid using edm::Handles at all.
Dereferencing an uninitialized edm::Handle leads to dereference of a nullptr which is undefined behavior. Rearranged code to avoid using edm::Handles at all.
Dereferencing an uninitialized edm::Handle leads to dereference of a nullptr which is undefined behavior. Rearranged code to avoid using edm::Handles at all.
Dereferencing an uninitialized edm::Handle leads to dereference of a nullptr which is undefined behavior. Rearranged code to avoid using edm::Handles at all.
Dereferencing an uninitialized edm::Handle leads to dereference of a nullptr which is undefined behavior. Rearranged code to avoid using edm::Handles at all.
PR description:
Dereferencing an uninitialized edm::Handle leads to dereference of a nullptr which is undefined behavior. Rearranged code to avoid using edm::Handles at all.
This was found by #30928.
PR validation:
Built together with #30928 and then ran workflow 23234.0. Previously that pull request failed that workflow but now it succeeds.