Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add explicit raw collection label for L1TRawToDigi #25193

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2018

Conversation

mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

The --repacked command tells the driver to grab raw data with the remapped label.
It does this by invoking the following:
from Configuration.Applications.ConfigBuilder import MassReplaceInputTag
MassReplaceInputTag(process, new="rawDataMapperByLabel", old="rawDataCollector")

The problem is that this doesn't seem to get picked up when this is set in the fillDescriptions, as in EventFilter/L1TRawToDigi/plugins/L1TRawToDigi.cc

This PR makes the InputTag explicit, such that it's picked up by MassReplaceInputTag

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mandrenguyen (Matthew Nguyen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

EventFilter/L1TRawToDigi

@nsmith-, @rekovic, @cmsbuild, @thomreis can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @thomreis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

please test workflow 140.56,140.57

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 11, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31588/console Started: 2018/11/11 10:42

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25193/31588/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3013827
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3013629
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

this workaround looks to solve the problem #25177 . @Dr15Jones is this supposed to be the expected behaviour of https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/FWCore/ParameterSet/python/MassReplace.py ?
I see that the InputTag parameter is set as tracked in the fillDescription function of L1TRawToDigi but then it is never mentioned in all the cfi files built using this module in the python area. I would like to understand whether this is to be considered as a bug (which is fixed by this PR), regadless of the behaviour of MassReplace....

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic @thomreis please see this fix, at present L1T is not correctly working for HI workflows

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

@fabiocos the python code can't see stuff that is only in C++. That being said, it actually isn't that the value is defined in fillDescription that causes the problem. The problem is there is a hand written cfi.py file for the module which takes precedence over the cfi.py file that fillDescription generates. The auto generated cfi.py would have had the InputLabel parameter exposed to python and therefore would have been changed by the call to MassReplace.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@Dr15Jones thank you for confirming, the problem is in the incomplete structure of the python cfi stored in the repository

@rekovic @thomreis I will integrate this PR to get the fix. Please sign it in case for reference

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

merge

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Nov 14, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants