Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added docs for trigger interface #2806

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jun 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

htahir1
Copy link
Contributor

@htahir1 htahir1 commented Jun 25, 2024

Describe changes

I added a bunch of docs I felt were missing

Pre-requisites

Please ensure you have done the following:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • If my change requires a change to docs, I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have based my new branch on develop and the open PR is targeting develop. If your branch wasn't based on develop read Contribution guide on rebasing branch to develop.
  • If my changes require changes to the dashboard, these changes are communicated/requested.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Other (add details above)

@htahir1 htahir1 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the internal To filter out internal PRs and issues label Jun 25, 2024
htahir1 and others added 3 commits June 25, 2024 16:52
Co-authored-by: Alex Strick van Linschoten <strickvl@users.noreply.github.com>
@htahir1 htahir1 requested a review from strickvl June 25, 2024 14:59
```

{% hint style="info" %}
Here we are calling one pipeline from within another pipeline, so functionally the `data_loading_pipeline` is functioning as a step within the `training_pipeline` though when it runs it is executing as an entirely separate pipeline. These two pipelines will be visible as separate pipelines within the ZenML dashboard, but practically they are working together within the umbrella of the `training_pipeline`. In order to trigger a pipeline from another, see [here](../trigger-pipelines/trigger-a-pipeline-from-another.md)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

though when it runs it is executing as an entirely separate pipeline It is not though right, it just adds the steps to training_pipeline?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually this entire paragraph is wrong. They will not show up as separate pipelines

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TIL :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just used what @strickvl said :D


There are three calls that need to be made in order to trigger a pipeline from the REST API:

1. `GET /pipelines?name=<PIPELINE_NAME>` -> This returns the <PIPELINE_ID>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This returns a list of responses, which they need to parse the ID from

There are three calls that need to be made in order to trigger a pipeline from the REST API:

1. `GET /pipelines?name=<PIPELINE_NAME>` -> This returns the <PIPELINE_ID>
2. `GET /pipeline_builds?pipeline_id=<PIPELINE_ID>` -> This returns the build ID
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This returns a list again, which they need to parse the ID from

2. `GET /pipeline_builds?pipeline_id=<PIPELINE_ID>` -> This returns the build ID
3. `POST /pipeline_builds/<BUILD_ID>/runs` -> This runs the pipeline. You can pass the [PipelineRunConfiguration](https://sdkdocs.zenml.io/latest/core_code_docs/core-config/#zenml.config.pipeline_run_configuration.PipelineRunConfiguration) in the body

The above set of REST calls means that you can only trigger a pipeline that has been [built before](../customize-docker-builds/reuse-docker-builds.md).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should probably mention again that this needs a build with a remote stack etc.

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
---
description: >-
Trigger a pipeline from the rest API.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

client

Trigger a pipeline from the rest API.
---

# Trigger a pipeline from another
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

client

@htahir1 htahir1 requested a review from schustmi June 26, 2024 12:19
Copy link
Contributor

Images automagically compressed by Calibre's image-actions

Compression reduced images by 38.8%, saving 26.43 KB.

Filename Before After Improvement Visual comparison
docs/book/.gitbook/assets/rest_api_step_1.png 22.31 KB 12.68 KB -43.2% View diff
docs/book/.gitbook/assets/rest_api_step_2.png 45.76 KB 28.96 KB -36.7% View diff

236 images did not require optimisation.

Update required: Update image-actions configuration to the latest version before 1/1/21. See README for instructions.

htahir1 and others added 3 commits June 26, 2024 14:29
Co-authored-by: Michael Schuster <schustmi@users.noreply.github.com>
@htahir1 htahir1 requested a review from strickvl June 26, 2024 12:53
@htahir1 htahir1 merged commit 6e60094 into develop Jun 27, 2024
8 checks passed
@htahir1 htahir1 deleted the doc/trigger-client-interface branch June 27, 2024 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation internal To filter out internal PRs and issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants