Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Build gems with strictness and verbosity & Add upper version limits to gemspec #135

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 15, 2023

Conversation

bastelfreak
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (670f0a9) 45.16% compared to head (26c0364) 45.16%.

❗ Current head 26c0364 differs from pull request most recent head cb7eab4. Consider uploading reports for the commit cb7eab4 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #135   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.16%   45.16%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         186      186           
=======================================
  Hits           84       84           
  Misses        102      102           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bastelfreak bastelfreak force-pushed the strict branch 2 times, most recently from 9a619a9 to 0d764f8 Compare May 28, 2023 17:52
@bastelfreak
Copy link
Member Author

This will require us to drop Ruby 2.5

metadata-json-lint.gemspec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bastelfreak bastelfreak merged commit b89f021 into voxpupuli:master Sep 15, 2023
5 of 7 checks passed
@bastelfreak bastelfreak deleted the strict branch September 15, 2023 11:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants