Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor incremental cache to be extensible #37258

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 28, 2022

Conversation

ijjk
Copy link
Member

@ijjk ijjk commented May 27, 2022

This refactors the incremental-cache and moves the file-system cache handling to it's own cache handler allowing it to be replaced by a custom cache handler (experimental).

Closes: #22619

Bug

  • Related issues linked using fixes #number
  • Integration tests added
  • Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md

Feature

  • Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
  • Related issues linked using fixes #number
  • Integration tests added
  • Documentation added
  • Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
  • Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md

Documentation / Examples

  • Make sure the linting passes by running yarn lint
  • The examples guidelines are followed from our contributing doc

@ijjk ijjk added created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team. type: next labels May 27, 2022
@ijjk
Copy link
Member Author

ijjk commented May 27, 2022

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
buildDuration 21s 20.9s -69ms
buildDurationCached 8s 8s ⚠️ +16ms
nodeModulesSize 626 MB 626 MB ⚠️ +3.58 kB
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 5.528 5.521 -0.01
/ avg req/sec 452.23 452.83 +0.6
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 2.226 2.282 ⚠️ +0.06
/error-in-render avg req/sec 1123.21 1095.64 ⚠️ -27.57
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
925.HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42 kB 42 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 29.2 kB 29.2 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.54 kB 1.54 kB
Overall change 72.9 kB 72.9 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 1.36 kB 1.36 kB
_error-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 308 B 308 B
css-HASH.js gzip 327 B 327 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.7 kB 2.7 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 359 B 359 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 920 B 920 B
image-HASH.js gzip 5.74 kB 5.74 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 263 B 263 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.65 kB 2.65 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 320 B 320 B
script-HASH.js gzip 391 B 391 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 318 B 318 B
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip 107 B 107 B
Overall change 16 kB 16 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 459 B 459 B
Overall change 459 B 459 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
index.html gzip 533 B 533 B
link.html gzip 547 B 547 B
withRouter.html gzip 528 B 528 B
Overall change 1.61 kB 1.61 kB

Default Build with SWC (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
buildDuration 23.9s 24.1s ⚠️ +179ms
buildDurationCached 8s 7.9s -126ms
nodeModulesSize 626 MB 626 MB ⚠️ +3.58 kB
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 5.443 5.481 ⚠️ +0.04
/ avg req/sec 459.29 456.1 ⚠️ -3.19
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 2.19 2.248 ⚠️ +0.06
/error-in-render avg req/sec 1141.8 1112.01 ⚠️ -29.79
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
925.HASH.js gzip 178 B 178 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42.7 kB 42.7 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 29.7 kB 29.7 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.54 kB 1.54 kB
Overall change 74 kB 74 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 1.35 kB 1.35 kB
_error-HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 311 B 311 B
css-HASH.js gzip 324 B 324 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.9 kB 2.9 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 357 B 357 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 920 B 920 B
image-HASH.js gzip 5.84 kB 5.84 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 261 B 261 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.78 kB 2.78 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 322 B 322 B
script-HASH.js gzip 392 B 392 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 317 B 317 B
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip 107 B 107 B
Overall change 16.4 kB 16.4 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 458 B 458 B
Overall change 458 B 458 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache Change
index.html gzip 532 B 532 B
link.html gzip 546 B 546 B
withRouter.html gzip 528 B 528 B
Overall change 1.61 kB 1.61 kB
Commit: 7401927

@ijjk ijjk marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2022 00:06
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 88b1f7d into vercel:canary May 28, 2022
@ijjk ijjk deleted the update/refactor-incremental-cache branch May 28, 2022 00:56
@PizzaPete
Copy link
Contributor

Is there any documentation about this feature?

@timneutkens
Copy link
Member

Experimental features are intentionally not documented as they can change at any time until they are released as stable.

kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022
Continuation of #37258 this moves the LRU cache to the `file-system-cache` so that any different cache handlers don't need to disable the LRU cache as this may cause inconsistencies with some cache handlers that need to be the source of truth.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 29, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants