Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Model output changes depending on whether Autoshape is used or not #9377

Closed
2 tasks done
ymerkli opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Model output changes depending on whether Autoshape is used or not #9377

ymerkli opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working Stale

Comments

@ymerkli
Copy link
Contributor

ymerkli commented Sep 12, 2022

Search before asking

  • I have searched the YOLOv5 issues and found no similar bug report.

YOLOv5 Component

AutoShape, DetectMultiBackend

Bug

In PR #9363, the following line was added to the constructor of the AutoShape wrapper:

m.export = True # do not output loss values

i.e. if the model which AutoShape wraps is a PyTorch model, then the export class attribute of the Detect layer is set to True.

Why was this added and is this correct?

This now changes the behavior of the Detect layer depending on whether we use the AutoShape wrapper or not. The forward pass of the Detect layer returns tuple (output, input) if export=False and output if export=True. Thus, depending on whether we use AutoShape or DetectMultiBackend, the Detect layer (and thus the model) either outputs 1 or 2 values, which IMO it should not, the API of the Detect layer should not depend on the wrapper (which the Detect layer is not aware of). See the example below.

Environment

  • YOLO: latest master
  • OS: Ubuntu 20.04
  • Python: 3.8.10

Minimal Reproducible Example

import torch

model_autoshape = torch.hub.load(
    "ultralytics/yolov5",
    model="yolov5s",
    pretrained=True,
    force_reload=True,
    autoshape=True,
)
model_dmb = torch.hub.load(
    "ultralytics/yolov5",
    model="yolov5s",
    pretrained=True,
    force_reload=True,
    autoshape=False,
)

images = torch.zeros((2, 3, 640, 640)).to(model_dmb.device)

output_autoshape = model_autoshape(images)
output_dmb = model_dmb(images)

print("AutoShape: ", type(output_autoshape), output_autoshape.shape)
print("DetectMultiBackend: ", type(output_dmb), [type(o) for o in output_dmb])

This outputs:

AutoShape:  <class 'torch.Tensor'> torch.Size([2, 25200, 85])
DetectMultiBackend:  <class 'list'> [<class 'torch.Tensor'>, <class 'list'>]

i.e. AutoShape returns the output of the detect layer only (the bounding box proposals), while DetectMultiBackend returns a tuple consisting of the Detect layer output and input.

Additional

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I'd like to help by submitting a PR!
@ymerkli ymerkli added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 12, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2022

👋 Hello @ymerkli, thank you for your interest in YOLOv5 🚀! Please visit our ⭐️ Tutorials to get started, where you can find quickstart guides for simple tasks like Custom Data Training all the way to advanced concepts like Hyperparameter Evolution.

If this is a 🐛 Bug Report, please provide screenshots and minimum viable code to reproduce your issue, otherwise we can not help you.

If this is a custom training ❓ Question, please provide as much information as possible, including dataset images, training logs, screenshots, and a public link to online W&B logging if available.

For business inquiries or professional support requests please visit https://ultralytics.com or email support@ultralytics.com.

Requirements

Python>=3.7.0 with all requirements.txt installed including PyTorch>=1.7. To get started:

git clone https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5  # clone
cd yolov5
pip install -r requirements.txt  # install

Environments

YOLOv5 may be run in any of the following up-to-date verified environments (with all dependencies including CUDA/CUDNN, Python and PyTorch preinstalled):

Status

CI CPU testing

If this badge is green, all YOLOv5 GitHub Actions Continuous Integration (CI) tests are currently passing. CI tests verify correct operation of YOLOv5 training (train.py), validation (val.py), inference (detect.py) and export (export.py) on macOS, Windows, and Ubuntu every 24 hours and on every commit.

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@ymerkli yes this is true, the outputs are different now. The change was made in #9341 because the tuple outputs were not JIT traceable, which is a common use case, and so the current implementation use export=True to make them JIT traceable.

DetectMultiBackend is used by val.py and detect.py. When used by val.py the second output can be used to compute validation losses, but in practice is not used and only metrics are computed.

We could move the export flag setting to DMB, but then val.py will break as it's expecting 2 outputs always from the model (inference outputs and training outputs).

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2022

👋 Hello, this issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Please note it will be closed if no further activity occurs.

Access additional YOLOv5 🚀 resources:

Access additional Ultralytics ⚡ resources:

Feel free to inform us of any other issues you discover or feature requests that come to mind in the future. Pull Requests (PRs) are also always welcomed!

Thank you for your contributions to YOLOv5 🚀 and Vision AI ⭐!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Oct 17, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants