Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix layers_normalizations.ipynb typos #2606

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2021
Merged

Conversation

inyong37
Copy link
Contributor

@inyong37 inyong37 commented Nov 15, 2021

Description

Brief Description of the PR: fix typos: "neual" -> "neural", and "independt" -> "independently".

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Checklist:

  • I've properly formatted my code according to the guidelines
    • By running Black + Flake8
    • By running pre-commit hooks
  • This PR addresses an already submitted issue for TensorFlow Addons
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • This PR contains modifications to C++ custom-ops

How Has This Been Tested?

If you're adding a bugfix or new feature please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes:
*

- typo "neual" -> "neural"
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

- typo "independt" -> "independently"
@inyong37 inyong37 changed the title Update layers_normalizations.ipynb with typo "neual" -> "neural" Fix layers_normalizations.ipynb typos Nov 15, 2021
@inyong37
Copy link
Contributor Author

@googlebot I fixed it.

@google-cla google-cla bot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels Nov 16, 2021
@inyong37 inyong37 marked this pull request as draft November 16, 2021 05:06
@inyong37 inyong37 marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2021 05:07
@bhack bhack merged commit a4113f6 into tensorflow:master Nov 16, 2021
@bhack
Copy link
Contributor

bhack commented Nov 16, 2021

Thanks

@inyong37
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bhack Thanks for review and merge :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants