Normative: rename the proposal #44
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Close but not deleted in case I want it back |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So per discussion in #42 I think most people do not comfortable with class
To keep the iterator semantics, it is a must for me to rename this proposal to include "iterator" in the name. The name can be bikeshed so I mark this as a draft PR.
The current prefer new name is
Iterator.range.numeric(). If you have any suggestions about the name, please comment in #45 instead of this PR. Let's make the discussion happen on that issue.close #41, close #22, close #17, close #42