Editorial: Split the "TV and TRV" clause into 2 clauses #2375
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ljharb
force-pushed
the
master
branch
3 times, most recently
from
3d0c24c
to
7a79833
Compare
michaelficarra
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2021
michaelficarra
added
the
ready to merge
... one for TV and one for TRV. (This duplicates 4 cases, but they're very simple.)
mathiasbynens
pushed a commit
to mathiasbynens/ecma262
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2021
... one for TV and one for TRV. (This duplicates 4 cases, but they're very simple.)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
... one for TV and one for TRV.
(This duplicates 4 cases, but they're very simple.)
In the status quo rendering, uses of TV and TRV aren't autolinked. With this change, they are.
Alternatively, @bakkot suggested having the two new clauses nested within the current clause 12.8.6.1, with the prose (and the final NOTE?) remaining in 12.8.6.1. I can do it that way if the editors prefer.