Blocks: Prebundle tocbot

[shilman]

Closes #28307

What I did

When we prebundle libraries it resolves ESM/CJS issues like #28307 because we publish CJS versions of

Did not have a good repro for the problem but verified with the user that the canary fixes the problem in their project. I also tested it in a fresh project on my local machine.

Checklist for Contributors

Testing

The changes in this PR are covered in the following automated tests:

• stories
• unit tests
• integration tests
• end-to-end tests

Manual testing

1. Fire up a project with the canary
2. Enable TOC with parameters: { docs: { toc: {} } } in .storybook/preview.ts
3. Navigate to an autodocs page and verify that the TOC displays properly

🦋 Canary release

This pull request has been released as version 0.0.0-pr-28318-sha-24019b5c. Try it out in a new sandbox by running npx storybook@0.0.0-pr-28318-sha-24019b5c sandbox or in an existing project with npx storybook@0.0.0-pr-28318-sha-24019b5c upgrade.

More information

Published version	0.0.0-pr-28318-sha-24019b5c
Triggered by	@shilman
Repository	storybookjs/storybook
Branch	shilman/28307-prebundle-tocbot
Commit	24019b5c
Datetime	Sun Jun 23 12:50:19 UTC 2024 (1719147019)
Workflow run	9633583213

To request a new release of this pull request, mention the @storybookjs/core team.

core team members can create a new canary release here or locally with gh workflow run --repo storybookjs/storybook canary-release-pr.yml --field pr=28318

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 86ac7f0. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

✅ Successfully ran 1 target

• nx affected -t check -c production --parallel=7

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[greptile-apps]

PR Summary

• Moved 'tocbot' from dependencies to devDependencies in /code/lib/blocks/package.json
• Aimed at optimizing build process
• Likely reduces production bundle size

_{1 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings}