Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: make TokenMaster request permissions reevaluation after remote destruct #13915

Merged

Conversation

osmaczko
Copy link
Contributor

What does the PR do

fixes: #13778
status-go: status-im/status-go#4904

Screenshot of functionality (including design for comparison)

remote_destruct_by_tm-2024-03-10_13.16.03.mp4

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

status-im-auto commented Mar 10, 2024

Jenkins Builds

Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
✔️ 3688109 #1 2024-03-10 15:15:27 ~6 min tests/nim 📄log
✔️ 3688109 #1 2024-03-10 15:15:39 ~6 min macos/aarch64 🍎dmg
✔️ 3688109 #1 2024-03-10 15:18:45 ~10 min macos/x86_64 🍎dmg
✔️ 3688109 #1 2024-03-10 15:19:34 ~10 min tests/ui 📄log
✔️ 3688109 #1 2024-03-10 15:26:05 ~17 min linux/x86_64 📦tgz
✔️ 3688109 #1 2024-03-10 15:33:24 ~24 min windows/x86_64 💿exe
✔️ e4ccc17 #2 2024-03-12 13:22:57 ~4 min macos/aarch64 🍎dmg
✔️ e4ccc17 #2 2024-03-12 13:25:28 ~6 min tests/nim 📄log
✔️ e4ccc17 #2 2024-03-12 13:26:31 ~7 min macos/x86_64 🍎dmg
✔️ e4ccc17 #2 2024-03-12 13:29:44 ~11 min tests/ui 📄log
✔️ e4ccc17 #2 2024-03-12 13:34:11 ~15 min linux/x86_64 📦tgz
✔️ e4ccc17 #2 2024-03-12 13:45:19 ~26 min windows/x86_64 💿exe

@osmaczko osmaczko force-pushed the feat/request-control-node-for-permissions-reevaluation branch from 3688109 to e4ccc17 Compare March 12, 2024 13:18
@osmaczko osmaczko merged commit 282c4e5 into master Mar 12, 2024
8 checks passed
@osmaczko osmaczko deleted the feat/request-control-node-for-permissions-reevaluation branch March 12, 2024 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Token remote-destructed by TM didn't update the member list
4 participants