Jakarta in Indonesia

[AngledLuffa]

Phrases like this: one entity or two?

Conll has "Old Trafford in Manchester" as two, but our standard would normally have "Jakarta, Indonesia" as one

[AngledLuffa]

Similar:

Querétaro       B-Location
,       I-Location
in      I-Location
Mexico  I-Location

paraguay_mercopress_7.txt.tsv

[AngledLuffa]

Wagga   B-Location
Wagga   I-Location
,       O
in      O
southern        O
New     B-Location
South   I-Location
Wales   I-Location

[AngledLuffa]

Birmingham, Alabama, in the United States - where to draw the line, or is it one entity?

[AngledLuffa]

Pusad   B-Location
,       O
in      O
the     O
Yavatmal        B-Location
district        O
of      O
Maharashtra     B-Location

[AngledLuffa]

where "in" really becomes a problem is when it merges multiple tags:

University      B-Organization
of      I-Organization
the     I-Organization
Witwatersrand   I-Organization  B-Location
in      O       I-Location
Johannesburg    O       I-Location
,       O       I-Location
South   O       I-Location
Africa  O       I-Location

or

Dublin  I-Organization  B-Location
in      O       I-Location
Ireland O       I-Location

University      B-Organization
of      I-Organization
Wroclaw I-Organization  B-Location
in      O
Poland  B-Location

[SecroLoL]

Thanks for these. I think we need to make a consistent labeling job here. Maybe we can say that if it's just a comma separating them, it should be one entity and if there are any other words then it shouldn't? What are your thoughts

[AngledLuffa]

I think as long as we're consistent, we're fine, but the example where two labels overlap because the in makes for a larger LOC is rather problematic

#7 (comment)

[SecroLoL]

Correct. I think the move here is that I'll edit all occurrences that I can find to have entities connected by commas to be one entity span, and then we can have entities that are separated by anything else (e.g. in) to be separate spans.