Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Links to IEEE Open Source Maintainers Manual #94

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions criteria/welcome-contributors.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ redirect_from:
* [Best Practices for the Governance of Digital Public Goods](https://ash.harvard.edu/publications/best-practices-governance-digital-public-goods) by the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation contains a playbook of different pracitces to implement in the governance along with case studies.
* [Organization & Structure of Open Source Software Development Initiatives](https://web.archive.org/web/20220526100844/https://clinic.cyber.harvard.edu/files/2017/03/2017-03_governance-FINAL.pdf) by Cyberlaw Clinic has a good overview of different governance models.
* [Governance of open source software: state of the art](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10997-007-9022-9) is an academic article on governance and might be useful for someone that needs solid arguments for their decisions.
* [IEEE Open Source Maintainers Manual](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/manual/) by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers can provide some inspiration as it provides the policies, guidelines, advice, and requirements for project leads, maintainers, contributors and other participants involved in IEEE Open Source projects.

### The contribution guidelines SHOULD document who is expected to cover the costs of reviewing contributions.

Expand Down
Loading