Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to use Windows zip dists when available #142

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 29, 2016
Merged

Update to use Windows zip dists when available #142

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 29, 2016

Conversation

datallah
Copy link
Contributor

The node project relatively recently (nodejs/node#5995) added Windows zip distributions, and we can use those instead of using the standalone windows binary and pulling the node_modules from the linux distribution.

This simplifies and makes the resulting node installation structure consistent with what the standard installation is on Windows.

This is backwards compatible because it will cause all existing node installations to be recreated because the directory name changed from e.g. "node-v4.5.0-windows-x64" to "node-v4.5.0-win-x64".

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.6%) to 96.39% when pulling 62a3aba on datallah:master into 5670731 on srs:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.6%) to 96.39% when pulling 85922c0 on datallah:master into 5670731 on srs:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.5%) to 97.473% when pulling 85922c0 on datallah:master into 5670731 on srs:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 98.069% when pulling dd2c5e4 on datallah:master into 5670731 on srs:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 98.188% when pulling e662c63 on datallah:master into 5670731 on srs:master.

@srs
Copy link
Owner

srs commented Nov 29, 2016

Nice. Thanks for the patch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants