Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[syncd] Lower bulk missing api message level from error to info #687

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2020

Conversation

kcudnik
Copy link
Collaborator

@kcudnik kcudnik commented Oct 30, 2020

there is command line switch for syncd which was added recently "-l" i think, and it enables use for bulk vendor sai api, previously by default we used 1by1, so actually those error messages are kind a justified that they are in ERROR, since in syncd command line right now we explicitly ask for bulk api

@kcudnik
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kcudnik commented Oct 30, 2020

@dmytroxshevchuk take a look

@daall
Copy link
Contributor

daall commented Oct 30, 2020

retest vs please

@lguohan
Copy link
Contributor

lguohan commented Oct 31, 2020

retest this please

1 similar comment
@kcudnik
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kcudnik commented Oct 31, 2020

retest this please

@lguohan
Copy link
Contributor

lguohan commented Nov 1, 2020

the test failure is not related to this pr.

@lguohan lguohan merged commit 5df11f5 into sonic-net:master Nov 1, 2020
@kcudnik kcudnik deleted the levelfix branch November 5, 2020 19:18
pettershao-ragilenetworks pushed a commit to pettershao-ragilenetworks/sonic-sairedis that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2022
…c-net#687)

there is command line switch for syncd which was added recently "-l" i think, and it enables use for bulk vendor sai api, previously by default we used 1by1, so actually those error messages are kind a justified that they are in ERROR, since in syncd command line right now we explicitly ask for bulk api
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants