Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Mellanox] fix the issue that failing to test whether dom supported prior to reading dom data #3120

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 6, 2019
Merged

[Mellanox] fix the issue that failing to test whether dom supported prior to reading dom data #3120

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 6, 2019

Conversation

stephenxs
Copy link
Collaborator

- What I did
fix the issue that failing to test whether dom supported prior to reading dom data.
it depends on pr https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/pull/3118)

- How I did it
test dom support prior to reading dom data for SFP.

- How to verify it
check whether log "Cannot get Module EEPROM data: Invalid argument" can be found in syslog in a testbed that has some SFP modules without DOM supporting.

- Description for the changelog
fix the issue that failing to test whether dom supported prior to reading dom data

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@stephenxs stephenxs marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2019 14:44
@stephenxs stephenxs changed the title fix the issue that failing to test whether dom supported prior to reading dom data [Mellanox] fix the issue that failing to test whether dom supported prior to reading dom data Jul 4, 2019
no need to read 16 bytes, 1 byte is enough since calibration and dom capability are all in bytes at offset 92
@lguohan
Copy link
Collaborator

lguohan commented Jul 5, 2019

retest this please

@lguohan lguohan merged commit f41e381 into sonic-net:master Jul 6, 2019
@stephenxs stephenxs deleted the fix-dom-capability-detect branch July 6, 2019 23:04
mssonicbld added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2024
…atically (#18049)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-utilities
```
* b5487357 - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) [route_check.py] account static routes in route_check.py (#3120) (9 hours ago) [Stepan Blyshchak]
* 64e1f9f4 - [Mellanox buffer migrator] Do not touch the buffer model on generic SKUs if the buffer configuration is empty (#3114) (19 hours ago) [Stephen Sun]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
sonic-otn pushed a commit to Weitang-Zheng/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
…atically (sonic-net#18049)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-utilities
```
* b5487357 - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) [route_check.py] account static routes in route_check.py (sonic-net#3120) (9 hours ago) [Stepan Blyshchak]
* 64e1f9f4 - [Mellanox buffer migrator] Do not touch the buffer model on generic SKUs if the buffer configuration is empty (sonic-net#3114) (19 hours ago) [Stephen Sun]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
saksarav-nokia pushed a commit to saksarav-nokia/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
…atically (sonic-net#18049)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-utilities
```
* b5487357 - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) [route_check.py] account static routes in route_check.py (sonic-net#3120) (9 hours ago) [Stepan Blyshchak]
* 64e1f9f4 - [Mellanox buffer migrator] Do not touch the buffer model on generic SKUs if the buffer configuration is empty (sonic-net#3114) (19 hours ago) [Stephen Sun]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants