Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[202205] [openssh]: Restore behavior of ClientAliveCountMax=0 (#12549) #12591

Conversation

saiarcot895
Copy link
Contributor

  • [openssh]: Restore behavior of ClientAliveCountMax=0

OpenSSH 8.2 changed the behavior of ClientAliveCountMax=0 such that setting it to 0 disables connection-killing entirely when the connection is idle. Revert that change.

Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot sarcot@microsoft.com

Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot sarcot@microsoft.com

Why I did it

Cherry-pick of master branch commit 0dd4d5d.

How I did it

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205

Description for the changelog

Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

* [openssh]: Restore behavior of ClientAliveCountMax=0

OpenSSH 8.2 changed the behavior of ClientAliveCountMax=0 such that
setting it to 0 disables connection-killing entirely when the connection
is idle. Revert that change.

Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>

* Remove build-dep command that should not be there

Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>

Signed-off-by: Saikrishna Arcot <sarcot@microsoft.com>
@yxieca yxieca merged commit 694136f into sonic-net:202205 Nov 3, 2022
@saiarcot895 saiarcot895 deleted the 202205-openssh-restore-client-alive-zero branch November 3, 2022 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants