[msft-202205] Added support of isolating given LC in Chassis with TSA mode #209
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e (#16732) What I did: Added support when TSA is done on Line Card make sure it's completely isolated from all e-BGP peer devices from this LC or remote LC Why I did: Currently when TSA is executed on LC routes are withdrawn from it's connected e-BGP peers only. e-BGP peers on remote LC can/will (via i-BGP) still have route pointing/attracting traffic towards this isolated LC. How I did: When TSA is applied on LC all the routes that are advertised via i-BGP are set with community tag of no-export so that when remote LC received these routes it does not send over to it's connected e-BGP peers. Also once we receive the route with no-export over iBGP match on it and and set the local preference of that route to lower value (80) so that we remove that route from the forwarding database. Below scenario explains why we do this: - LC1 advertise R1 to LC3 - LC2 advertise R1 to LC3 - On LC3 we have multi-path/ECMP over both LC1 and LC2 - On LC3 R1 received from LC1 is consider best route over R1 over received from LC2 and is send to LC3 e-BGP peers - Now we do TSA on LC2 - LC3 will receive R1 from LC2 with community no-export and from LC1 same as earlier (no change) - LC3 will still get traffic for R1 since it is still advertised to e-BGP peers (since R1 from LC1 is best route) - LC3 will forward to both LC1 and LC2 (ecmp) and this causes issue as LC2 is in TSA mode and should not receive traffic To fix above scenario we change the preference to lower value of R1 received from LC2 so that it is removed from Multi-path/ECMP group. How I verfiy: UT has been added to make sure Template generation is correct Manual Verification of the functionality sonic-mgmt test case will be updated accordingly. Please note this PR is on top of this :#16714 which needs to be merged first. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <abdosi@microsoft.com>
deepak-singhal0408
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2024
mssonicbld
added a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage-msft
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2024
…lly (#18574) #### Why I did it src/sonic-gnmi ``` * 4b12af9 - (HEAD -> 202305, origin/202305) Merge pull request sonic-net#209 from zbud-msft/revert_pfcwd_202305 (2 minutes ago) [StormLiangMS] * 802dbb7 - Revert "Replace PFC_WD_TABLE with PFC_WD (sonic-net#173)" (28 hours ago) [Zain Budhwani] * e1397c4 - Revert "Account for GLOBAL key in PFC_WD (sonic-net#178)" (28 hours ago) [Zain Budhwani] ``` #### How I did it #### How to verify it #### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did:
Cherry-pick of PR: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#16732