Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let Shapes and SlidePlaceholders fulfill the Mapping interface #800

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

timhoffm
Copy link

Both are essentially mappings and define the minimal interface
for collections.abc.Mapping (https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.abc.html#collections-abstract-base-classes),
i.e. __iter__, __getitem__ and __len__.

By inheriting from Mapping we mix in the full mapping behavior, .e.g. .get()
and .key() methods. This is to make these collections feel more pythonic.
Additionally, it's a real usability improvement: e.g. for SlidePlaceholders
one cannot guess the valid keys, which makes placeholders[idx] difficult to use.
Having placeholders.keys() available makes inspection much easier.

Both are essentially mappings and define the minimal interface
for `collections.abc.Mapping` (https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.abc.html#collections-abstract-base-classes).

By inheriting from `Mapping` we mix in the full mapping behavior, .e.g. `.get()`
and `.key()` methods. This is to make these collections feel more pythonic.
Additionally, it's a real usability improvement: e.g. for `SlidePlaceholders`
one cannot guess the valid keys, which makes `placeholders[idx]` difficult to use.
Having `placeholders.keys()` available makes inspection much easier.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant