-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
21 additions
and
21 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,27 +1,27 @@ | ||
# Draft 2019-09 Scope | ||
|
||
- [ ] introduction of scopes reduces jlib performance by ~20-22%. can we do sth about this? | ||
- moving this logic to draft 2019 would solve this, but introduce two different apis unless we can hide it | ||
- a consistent api might lead to performance impacts of legacy drafts | ||
- an inconsistent api would not be manageable (duplicate utils like getTemplate etc) | ||
- there is probably a lot that can be improved (also in compile time) | ||
- [ ] add all subSchemas to scope-history as only if and anyOf are tested | ||
- [ ] decision on supported draft 2019-09 format-options | ||
- [ ] `getSchema` inconsistent return of non-node for root-requests | ||
- [ ] introduction of scopes reduces jlib performance by ~20-22%. can we do sth about this? | ||
- moving this logic to draft 2019 would solve this, but introduce two different apis unless we can hide it | ||
- a consistent api might lead to performance impacts of legacy drafts | ||
- an inconsistent api would not be manageable (duplicate utils like getTemplate etc) | ||
- there is probably a lot that can be improved (also in compile time) | ||
- [ ] add all subSchemas to scope-history as only if and anyOf are tested | ||
- [ ] decision on supported draft 2019-09 format-options | ||
|
||
# Tasks | ||
|
||
- [ ] template default options retrieved from draft | ||
- [ ] additionalProperties: true per default | ||
- [ ] compile needs another parameter for rootschema, in case refs are defined elsewhere | ||
|
||
- [ ] template default options retrieved from draft | ||
- [ ] additionalProperties: true per default | ||
- [ ] compile needs another parameter for rootschema, in case refs are defined elsewhere | ||
|
||
### possibly | ||
|
||
- [ ] remove hard coded schema interpretation | ||
- [ ] Improve -- _oneOf-Error messages_ (specific errors where possible, instead of one-of-error) | ||
- [ ] Add -- Resolve $ref local json-pointer without requiring compiled schema | ||
- [ ] Refactor -- move type validation as keyword to validation/keywords | ||
- [ ] Refactor -- Use addValidation to setup base validation mappings? | ||
- [ ] Features -- latest draft support | ||
- [ ] Refactor -- improve performance | ||
- [ ] Feature -- Helper to find a json- and json-schema-pointer | ||
- [ ] remove hard coded schema interpretation | ||
- [ ] Improve -- _oneOf-Error messages_ (specific errors where possible, instead of one-of-error) | ||
- [ ] Add -- Resolve $ref local json-pointer without requiring compiled schema | ||
- [ ] Refactor -- move type validation as keyword to validation/keywords | ||
- [ ] Refactor -- Use addValidation to setup base validation mappings? | ||
- [ ] Features -- latest draft support | ||
- [ ] Refactor -- improve performance | ||
- [ ] Feature -- Helper to find a json- and json-schema-pointer |