chore: Update .gitignore and .npmrc, delete unused vitest.config.js f… #22
Conversation
…iles, and add test file for server
WalkthroughThe update enhances project configurations across multiple files, focusing on dependency management, testing setups, and modularization. Key changes include adding XML file exclusions in Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 0868475. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 1 targetSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://github.com/avatars/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (22)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .npmrc (1 hunks)
- apps/server/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- apps/server/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/server/test/index.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/server/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- apps/server/vite.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/util/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/util/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/util/test/index.test.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/util/vite.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/web/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/web/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/db.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/models/User.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/web/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/web/vite.config.js (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
nx.json
22-22: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (74)
.npmrc (5)
1-1: Consider the impact of removingstrict-peer-dependencies.Removing
strict-peer-dependencies=falsemeans that the project will no longer enforce strict checks on peer dependencies. This could lead to potential conflicts or issues if incompatible versions of peer dependencies are installed.Ensure that the project does not rely on strict peer dependency checks to avoid potential issues.
1-1: Verify the publishing strategy after removingpublish-branch.The removal of
publish-branch=mainsuggests a change in the publishing strategy. Verify that the project correctly handles publishing without this setting.Ensure that the publishing process is correctly configured and documented.
1-1: Assess the impact of removingsave-prefix.Removing
save-prefix=""means that the project will no longer specify a prefix for saved dependencies. This could affect how versions are resolved and stored.Ensure that the removal of
save-prefixdoes not lead to version resolution issues.
1-1: Evaluate the removal oflink-workspace-packages.The removal of
link-workspace-packages=falseindicates a potential shift away from workspace management features. Verify that this change does not negatively impact the handling of local packages in a multi-package repository.Ensure that the project can still manage local packages effectively without this setting.
1-1: Consider the implications of removingsave-workspace-protocol.Removing
save-workspace-protocol=rollingcould affect how workspace dependencies are saved. Verify that the project handles workspace dependencies correctly without this setting.Ensure that the removal of
save-workspace-protocoldoes not lead to issues with workspace dependencies..gitignore (1)
11-11: Good addition to ignore XML files.Adding
*.xmlto.gitignorehelps prevent unnecessary XML files from being tracked in the repository.libs/util/test/index.test.ts (1)
1-7: Basic test file setup looks good.The test file sets up a basic test case using Vitest. Consider adding more comprehensive tests to cover various scenarios.
apps/server/tsconfig.json (1)
5-6: LGTM!The addition of
"composite": trueis a good practice for managing project dependencies and improving the build process.libs/web/tsconfig.json (1)
10-10: LGTM!The adjustment of the path in the
referencesarray simplifies the reference and may indicate a reorganization of the project structure.libs/web/src/db.ts (3)
3-4: Good practice: Use of environment variable for database URL.Using
process.env.DATABASE_URLfor the database URL enhances flexibility and follows best practices for environment configuration.
7-7: Good practice: Use of environment variable for storage property.Updating the
storageproperty to useDATABASE_URLensures that the database connection can adapt dynamically based on the environment.
12-12: Good practice: Synchronize models with the database.Calling
db.sync()ensures that the database schema is in sync with the defined models, which is crucial for applications using Sequelize.apps/server/eslint.config.js (1)
22-22: Good practice: Ignore coverage directory in ESLint configuration.Adding the
coveragedirectory to theignoresproperty ensures that ESLint does not run on generated files, which are not relevant for linting.libs/util/eslint.config.js (1)
22-22: Good practice: Ignore coverage directory in ESLint configuration.Adding the
coveragedirectory to theignoresproperty ensures that ESLint does not run on generated files, which are not relevant for linting.libs/web/eslint.config.js (1)
22-22: LGTM! The change improves the linting process.Adding the
coveragedirectory to theignoresarray ensures that coverage files are excluded from linting, which is a good practice.nx.json (1)
8-8: LGTM! The changes streamline the build process and integrate testing.The modifications to the
buildandtesttargets enhance efficiency and testing capabilities.Also applies to: 17-18
apps/server/vite.config.js (1)
1-22: LGTM! The Vitest configuration is comprehensive.The setup for test coverage and reporting is well done and enhances the testing capabilities of the server.
libs/util/vite.config.js (7)
1-1: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the
defineConfigfunction fromvitest/config.
4-7: Coverage configuration is correct.The coverage configuration enables coverage for all files and excludes specific patterns.
8-15: Coverage exclusion patterns are appropriate.The exclusion patterns for coverage are well-chosen, excluding test files, binaries, and declaration files.
16-17: Coverage reporters configuration is correct.The coverage reporters are set to
lcov,text, andcobertura, which are standard choices for coverage reporting.
18-19: Test reporters configuration is correct.The test reporters are set to
junit,default, andhanging-process, and the output file is specified asmcos.junit.xml.
20-21: Pool configuration is correct.The pool is set to
forks, which is appropriate for parallel test execution.
22-22: Watch configuration is correct.The watch mode is disabled, which is suitable for CI environments.
libs/web/vite.config.js (7)
1-1: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the
defineConfigfunction fromvitest/config.
4-7: Coverage configuration is correct.The coverage configuration enables coverage for all files and excludes specific patterns.
8-15: Coverage exclusion patterns are appropriate.The exclusion patterns for coverage are well-chosen, excluding test files, binaries, and declaration files.
16-17: Coverage reporters configuration is correct.The coverage reporters are set to
lcov,text, andcobertura, which are standard choices for coverage reporting.
18-19: Test reporters configuration is correct.The test reporters are set to
junit,default, andhanging-process, and the output file is specified asmcos.junit.xml.
20-21: Pool configuration is correct.The pool is set to
forks, which is appropriate for parallel test execution.
22-22: Watch configuration is correct.The watch mode is disabled, which is suitable for CI environments.
tsconfig.json (3)
12-12:libconfiguration is correct.Setting
libtoESNextallows the use of the latest ECMAScript features.
15-15:skipLibCheckconfiguration is correct.Setting
skipLibChecktotruespeeds up the compilation process by skipping type checking of declaration files.
22-26:referencesconfiguration is correct.The expanded
referencessection indicates a restructuring or expansion of the project’s modular architecture, allowing for better organization and potentially improved code reuse.libs/util/package.json (9)
12-12: LGTM! Enhanced build script.The addition of
--buildand--verboseflags to thebuildscript improves the build process by providing detailed output and ensuring all dependencies are built correctly.
13-13: LGTM! New test script.The addition of the
testscript usingvitestenhances the project's testing capabilities.
20-20: LGTM! Updated @types/node dependency.The minor version update from
^20.14.11to20.14.12likely includes bug fixes or improvements.
22-22: LGTM! Updated @vitest/coverage-v8 dependency.The minor version update from
^2.0.3to^2.0.4likely includes enhancements related to coverage reporting.
23-23: LGTM! Added @vitest/ui dependency.The addition of
@vitest/uienhances the testing capabilities provided by Vitest, possibly including a user interface for test results.
24-24: LGTM! Updated eslint dependency.The update from
8to^8.57.0may offer new linting rules or fixes.
25-25: LGTM! Added nx dependency.The addition of
nxenhances monorepo management and tooling in the project.
29-29: LGTM! Added vite dependency.The addition of
vitealigns with modern front-end development practices, enhancing the build process.
30-30: LGTM! Updated vitest dependency.The update from
^1.3.1to^2.0.4likely includes improvements and new features.libs/web/src/models/User.ts (3)
17-17: LGTM! Refined type declaration for id.The change from
public id!: number;todeclare id: number;refines the type declaration approach, enhancing type safety and clarity.
18-18: LGTM! Refined type declaration for username.The change from
public username!: string;todeclare username: string;refines the type declaration approach, enhancing type safety and clarity.
19-19: LGTM! Refined type declaration for password.The change from
public password!: string;todeclare password: string;refines the type declaration approach, enhancing type safety and clarity.libs/web/package.json (9)
12-12: LGTM! Enhanced build script.The addition of
--buildand--verboseflags to thebuildscript improves the build process by providing detailed output and ensuring all dependencies are built correctly.
13-13: LGTM! New test script.The addition of the
testscript usingvitestenhances the project's testing capabilities.
20-20: LGTM! Updated @types/node dependency.The minor version update from
^20.14.11to20.14.12likely includes bug fixes or improvements.
22-22: LGTM! Updated @vitest/coverage-v8 dependency.The minor version update from
^2.0.3to^2.0.4likely includes enhancements related to coverage reporting.
23-23: LGTM! Added @vitest/ui dependency.The addition of
@vitest/uienhances the testing capabilities provided by Vitest, possibly including a user interface for test results.
24-24: LGTM! Updated eslint dependency.The update from
8to^8.57.0may offer new linting rules or fixes.
25-25: LGTM! Added nx dependency.The addition of
nxenhances monorepo management and tooling in the project.
29-29: LGTM! Added vite dependency.The addition of
vitealigns with modern front-end development practices, enhancing the build process.
30-30: LGTM! Updated vitest dependency.The update from
^1.3.1to^2.0.4likely includes improvements and new features.apps/server/package.json (9)
8-8: Approved: Enhanced build script.The addition of
--buildand--verboseflags to thebuildscript improves the build process by providing more detailed output.
11-11: Approved: Added test script.The new
testscript usingvitestenhances the project's testing capabilities.
12-12: Approved: Updated dev script.The updated
devscript includes a more complex command for ESM support, indicating a move towards modern JavaScript practices.
18-18: Approved: Updated @types/node dependency.The minor version update of
@types/nodeis unlikely to introduce breaking changes.
20-20: Approved: Updated @vitest/coverage-v8 dependency.The minor version update of
@vitest/coverage-v8is unlikely to introduce breaking changes.
21-21: Approved: Added @vitest/ui dependency.The addition of
@vitest/uienhances the project's testing capabilities by providing a user interface for the Vitest testing framework.
22-22: Approved: Updated eslint dependency.The minor version update of
eslintis unlikely to introduce breaking changes.
23-23: Approved: Added nx dependency.The addition of
nxsuggests an integration of tools for managing monorepos or enhancing workspace capabilities.
28-28: Approved: Updated vitest dependency.The significant version update of
vitestmay introduce new features or improvements in the testing framework.package.json (7)
21-21: Approved: Removed @nx/eslint dependency.The removal of
@nx/eslintsuggests a potential shift in the project's reliance on this tool, possibly indicating a move towards alternative solutions or a simplification of the build process.
21-21: Approved: Removed @nx/eslint-plugin dependency.The removal of
@nx/eslint-pluginsuggests a potential shift in the project's reliance on this tool, possibly indicating a move towards alternative solutions or a simplification of the build process.
21-21: Approved: Removed @nx/vite dependency.The removal of
@nx/vitesuggests a potential shift in the project's reliance on this tool, possibly indicating a move towards alternative solutions or a simplification of the build process.
21-21: Approved: Added @vitest/coverage-v8 dependency.The addition of
@vitest/coverage-v8enhances the project's testing capabilities by providing coverage support for the Vitest testing framework.
22-22: Approved: Updated @vitest/ui dependency.The significant version update of
@vitest/uimay introduce new features or improvements in the testing framework.
28-28: Approved: Updated typescript-eslint dependency.The minor version update of
typescript-eslintis unlikely to introduce breaking changes.
29-29: Approved: Updated vite dependency.The significant version update of
vitemay introduce new features or improvements in the build tool.libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (2)
2-3: Approved: Updated import statement.The addition of
createUsersuggests that the authentication process is now contingent upon the successful creation of a user account.
49-62: Approved: Updated test case for successful login.The updated test case ensures that user creation is part of the authentication flow and modifies the expectations of the response to align with new application logic.
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1)
79-80: Verify response format change.Ensure that changing the response format to plain text aligns with client requirements and doesn't break existing functionality.
Verification successful
Verify response format change.
The response format change to plain text in the
handleAuthLoginfunction aligns with client requirements and does not break existing functionality. The test cases inlibs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.tsconfirm that the response format and headers are as expected.
libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.tslibs/web/src/index.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the response format change in `handleAuthLogin`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No breaking changes due to response format change. rg --type javascript -A 5 'handleAuthLogin'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the response format change in `handleAuthLogin`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No breaking changes due to response format change. rg --glob '*.js' -A 5 'handleAuthLogin'Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the response format change in `handleAuthLogin`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No breaking changes due to response format change. rg --glob '*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}' -A 5 'handleAuthLogin'Length of output: 2908
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/server/vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/util/vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/web/vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
nx.json
22-22: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (18)
apps/server/vitest.config.js (5)
6-15: LGTM! Verify the exclusion patterns.The coverage settings are comprehensive and exclude unnecessary files, which is beneficial for focused coverage analysis.
Ensure that the exclusion patterns cover all irrelevant files.
16-16: LGTM! Multiple reporters enhance flexibility.Using multiple reporters for coverage reporting enhances the flexibility and usability of the reports.
18-18: LGTM! Multiple test result reporters improve CI/CD integration.Adding multiple reporters for test results enhances integration with CI/CD pipelines.
19-19: LGTM! Specifying the output file for JUnit reports is beneficial.Specifying the output file for JUnit reports facilitates easier integration with CI/CD pipelines.
20-21: LGTM! Pool setting and watch mode configuration are appropriate.Setting the pool to "forks" may improve test performance, and disabling watch mode is suitable for certain environments.
libs/util/vitest.config.js (5)
6-15: LGTM! Verify the exclusion patterns.The coverage settings are comprehensive and exclude unnecessary files, which is beneficial for focused coverage analysis.
Ensure that the exclusion patterns cover all irrelevant files.
16-16: LGTM! Multiple reporters enhance flexibility.Using multiple reporters for coverage reporting enhances the flexibility and usability of the reports.
18-18: LGTM! Multiple test result reporters improve CI/CD integration.Adding multiple reporters for test results enhances integration with CI/CD pipelines.
19-19: LGTM! Specifying the output file for JUnit reports is beneficial.Specifying the output file for JUnit reports facilitates easier integration with CI/CD pipelines.
20-21: LGTM! Pool setting and watch mode configuration are appropriate.Setting the pool to "forks" may improve test performance, and disabling watch mode is suitable for certain environments.
libs/web/vitest.config.js (5)
6-15: LGTM! Verify the exclusion patterns.The coverage settings are comprehensive and exclude unnecessary files, which is beneficial for focused coverage analysis.
Ensure that the exclusion patterns cover all irrelevant files.
16-16: LGTM! Multiple reporters enhance flexibility.Using multiple reporters for coverage reporting enhances the flexibility and usability of the reports.
18-18: LGTM! Multiple test result reporters improve CI/CD integration.Adding multiple reporters for test results enhances integration with CI/CD pipelines.
19-19: LGTM! Specifying the output file for JUnit reports is beneficial.Specifying the output file for JUnit reports facilitates easier integration with CI/CD pipelines.
20-21: LGTM! Pool setting and watch mode configuration are appropriate.Setting the pool to "forks" may improve test performance, and disabling watch mode is suitable for certain environments.
nx.json (3)
8-8: Verify the impact of removing the "clean" dependency from the build target.The
dependsOnarray for the "build" target has been modified to remove the "clean" dependency. Ensure that this change does not introduce issues related to stale build artifacts.
16-18: Verify the correctness of the new "test" target.The new "test" target depends on the "build" target and specifies an output directory for coverage reports. Ensure that the coverage directory is correctly specified and that the tests are properly executed after the build.
8-18: Verify the impact of removing the "plugins" section.The removal of the "plugins" section, which included configurations for
@nx/vite/pluginand@nx/eslint/plugin, suggests a potential shift in the project's tooling strategy or a simplification of the configuration. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact the project's build or linting processes.
The code changes in `ServerController.ts` move the `headerstoRecords` function to a separate file `headerstoRecords.ts` for better organization and reusability. This improves the maintainability of the codebase and follows best practices for modularization.
The code changes in the package.json files of the server, util, and web directories add a new "lint" task to run ESLint on the source code in the src directory. This ensures consistent code style and helps catch potential errors or issues early in the development process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range comments (2)
apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (2)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationAdd error handling in the
stopfunction inServerController.ts.The
stopfunction currently stops multiple servers and logs their status but lacks explicit error handling. If any of thecloseoperations fail, it could lead to unhandled promise rejections. Implement proper error handling to manage any issues during the server shutdown process.
- File:
apps/server/src/ServerController.ts- Lines: 108-118
Analysis chain
Line range hint
108-118:
Verify server stop and error handling instop.Ensure that the servers are stopped correctly and handle errors properly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify server stop and error handling in stop function. # Test: Check if the servers are stopped correctly and handle errors. Expect: The servers should stop and handle errors properly. rg --type javascript 'this._httpServer.close' -A 5Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify server stop and error handling in stop function. # Test: Check if the servers are stopped correctly and handle errors. Expect: The servers should stop and handle errors properly. rg --type ts 'this._httpServer.close' -A 5 # Additionally, search for the `stop` function implementation to ensure proper error handling. rg --type ts 'stop()' -A 10Length of output: 4983
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationVerify error handling in
handleSocketConnection.The
handleSocketConnectionfunction does not handle errors or edge cases, such as invalid data or connection issues. Consider adding error handling to ensure the function manages potential errors gracefully.
apps/server/src/ServerController.ts, lines 23-31Analysis chain
Line range hint
23-31:
Verify error handling inhandleSocketConnection.Ensure that the function handles errors and edge cases properly, such as invalid data or connection issues.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in handleSocketConnection function. # Test: Check if the function handles errors and edge cases. Expect: The function should handle errors properly. rg --type javascript 'socket.on("error")' -A 5Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in handleSocketConnection function. # Test: Check if the function handles errors and edge cases. Expect: The function should handle errors properly. rg --type typescript 'socket.on("error")' -A 5Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in handleSocketConnection function. # Test: Search for the handleSocketConnection function and inspect its content for error handling. rg 'function handleSocketConnection' -A 20Length of output: 1404
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (10)
- apps/server/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/server/project.json (1 hunks)
- apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/server/src/headerstoRecords.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/server/test/headerstoRecords.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/server/vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/util/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/util/vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/web/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/web/vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
apps/server/test/headerstoRecords.test.ts
[error] 3-3: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.
Using the node: protocol is more explicit and signals that the imported module belongs to Node.js.
Unsafe fix: Add the node: protocol.(lint/style/useNodejsImportProtocol)
Additional comments not posted (38)
apps/server/project.json (1)
2-2: Verify the impact of removing thetargetssection.The removal of the
targetssection, including thetesttarget, might affect how tests are executed for this project. Ensure that the test execution is managed elsewhere or provide documentation on the new test execution process.apps/server/vitest.config.js (2)
6-12: Approve the coverage configuration changes.The coverage configuration now includes enabling coverage, specifying exclusions, and adding multiple reporters. These changes improve the coverage analysis by focusing on relevant files and providing diverse output formats.
15-18: Approve the reporting and test execution configuration changes.The addition of multiple reporters, specifying an output file, setting the pool to "forks", and disabling watch mode enhance the reporting functionalities and optimize test execution.
libs/util/vitest.config.js (2)
6-12: Approve the coverage configuration changes.The coverage configuration now includes enabling coverage, specifying exclusions, and adding multiple reporters. These changes improve the coverage analysis by focusing on relevant files and providing diverse output formats.
15-18: Approve the reporting and test execution configuration changes.The addition of multiple reporters, specifying an output file, setting the pool to "forks", and disabling watch mode enhance the reporting functionalities and optimize test execution.
libs/web/vitest.config.js (5)
6-13: LGTM! Enhanced coverage configuration.The changes improve coverage reporting and allow for excluding specific files from coverage calculations. This enhances the accuracy and relevance of coverage reports.
15-15: LGTM! Improved test result reporting.The addition of new reporters enhances the variety of output formats for test results, improving CI/CD integration and usability for developers.
16-16: LGTM! Specified output file for JUnit reports.Setting the
outputFileproperty to "mcos.junit.xml" is useful for CI/CD pipelines.
17-17: LGTM! Parallel test execution configuration.Setting the
poolproperty to "forks" likely improves performance by affecting parallel test execution.
18-18: LGTM! Disabled watch mode.Setting the
watchproperty to false indicates that the test runner will not monitor file changes during execution, which is useful for certain environments.libs/util/package.json (3)
12-12: LGTM! Enhanced build script.The updated build script with
--buildand--verboseflags improves the TypeScript compiler's output, providing more detailed information during the build process.
13-13: LGTM! New test script.The new test script utilizing
vitestenhances the project's testing capabilities, allowing for improved test management and execution.
21-31: LGTM! Updated devDependencies.The updates to package versions and the addition of new dependencies modernize the project's build and testing processes, enhance the developer experience through improved tooling, and ensure that dependencies are current.
libs/web/package.json (9)
12-12: LGTM! Thebuildscript improvement is beneficial.The addition of
--buildand--verboseflags enhances the build process by providing more detailed output and ensuring all dependencies are built correctly.
13-13: LGTM! The newtestscript is a positive addition.Introducing
vitestfor testing reflects modern testing practices and enhances the project's testing capabilities.
21-21: LGTM! The@types/nodeversion update is appropriate.Updating from
^20.14.11to20.14.12likely includes minor improvements or bug fixes.
23-23: LGTM! The@vitest/coverage-v8version update is appropriate.Updating from
^2.0.3to^2.0.4likely includes minor improvements or bug fixes.
24-24: LGTM! The addition of@vitest/uiis beneficial.Adding
@vitest/uienhances the testing experience by providing a user interface for test results.
25-25: LGTM! Theeslintversion update is appropriate.Updating from
8to^8.57.0ensures the project benefits from the latest linting rules and improvements.
26-26: LGTM! The addition ofnxis beneficial.Adding
nxenhances monorepo management and tooling capabilities.
30-30: LGTM! The addition ofviteis beneficial.Adding
viteenhances the build process with its speed and efficiency in modern web development.
31-31: LGTM! Thevitestversion update is appropriate.Updating from
^1.3.1to^2.0.4ensures the project benefits from the latest testing features and improvements.apps/server/package.json (10)
8-8: LGTM! Thebuildscript improvement is beneficial.The addition of
--buildand--verboseflags enhances the build process by providing more detailed output and ensuring all dependencies are built correctly.
12-12: LGTM! The newtestscript is a positive addition.Introducing
vitestfor testing reflects modern testing practices and enhances the project's testing capabilities.
13-13: LGTM! The updateddevscript is beneficial.The updated
devscript enhances the development experience by supporting modern JavaScript practices.
19-19: LGTM! The@types/nodeversion update is appropriate.Updating from
^20.14.11to20.14.12likely includes minor improvements or bug fixes.
21-21: LGTM! The@vitest/coverage-v8version update is appropriate.Updating from
^2.0.3to^2.0.4likely includes minor improvements or bug fixes.
22-22: LGTM! The addition of@vitest/uiis beneficial.Adding
@vitest/uienhances the testing experience by providing a user interface for test results.
23-23: LGTM! Theeslintversion update is appropriate.Updating from
8to^8.57.0ensures the project benefits from the latest linting rules and improvements.
24-24: LGTM! The addition ofnxis beneficial.Adding
nxenhances monorepo management and tooling capabilities.
28-28: LGTM! The addition ofviteis beneficial.Adding
viteenhances the build process with its speed and efficiency in modern web development.
29-29: LGTM! Thevitestversion update is appropriate.Updating from
^1.3.1to^2.0.4ensures the project benefits from the latest testing features and improvements.apps/server/test/headerstoRecords.test.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM! The import ofheaderstoRecordsis correct.The import path is correct and the function
headerstoRecordsexists in the specified file.
6-22: LGTM! The test case for converting headers to records is well-written.The test case correctly checks if the
headerstoRecordsfunction converts headers to records as expected.
24-32: LGTM! The test case for handling empty headers is well-written.The test case correctly checks if the
headerstoRecordsfunction handles empty headers as expected.apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (3)
Line range hint
93-106:
Verify server start and error handling instart.Ensure that the servers are started correctly and handle errors properly.
Line range hint
33-91:
Verify server initialization and event listeners inServerController.Ensure that the servers are correctly initialized and event listeners are properly set up in the constructor.
Verification successful
Verification successful: Server initialization and event listeners are correctly set up in the
ServerControllerclass.
- The servers (
_httpServer,_loginServer,_personaServer,_lobbyServer,_databaseServer) are initialized usingWrappedServer.- Event listeners for
_readThreadare properly set up foruserExit,userRestart, anduserHelpevents.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify server initialization and event listeners in ServerController class. # Test: Check if the servers are correctly initialized and event listeners are set up. Expect: The servers should be initialized and event listeners should be set up. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'class ServerController { constructor() { $$$ } }'Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the constructor implementation of the ServerController class to verify server initialization and event listeners. # Locate the ServerController class definition and extract the constructor implementation. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'class ServerController { constructor() { $$$ } }' -A 50Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the ServerController class and extract the constructor implementation to verify server initialization and event listeners. # Locate the file containing the ServerController class definition. rg 'class ServerController' -l | xargs -I {} sh -c 'echo "File: {}"; rg "constructor() {" -A 50 {}'Length of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the ServerController class and extract the constructor implementation to verify server initialization and event listeners. # Locate the file containing the ServerController class definition. rg 'class ServerController' -l | xargs -I {} sh -c 'echo "File: {}"; rg "constructor\(\) \{" -A 50 {}'Length of output: 1672
Line range hint
11-21:
Verify the usage ofheaderstoRecords.Ensure that the
headerstoRecordsfunction imported fromheaderstoRecords.jsis correctly used and handles headers as expected.Verification successful
Verification successful: The
headerstoRecordsfunction correctly processes headers by converting arrays to comma-separated strings and ensuring both keys and values are strings. No issues found with its usage in thehandleIncomingRequestfunction.
apps/server/src/headerstoRecords.ts: Implementation ofheaderstoRecords.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of headerstoRecords function. # Test: Check the implementation of headerstoRecords function. Expect: The function should correctly process headers. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'function headerstoRecords(headers: $_): $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the headerstoRecords function across the codebase using ripgrep. rg 'function headerstoRecords'Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the headerstoRecords function from headerstoRecords.ts. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'function headerstoRecords(headers: $_): $_ { $$$ }' apps/server/src/headerstoRecords.tsLength of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the headerstoRecords function from headerstoRecords.ts using ripgrep. rg -A 20 'function headerstoRecords' apps/server/src/headerstoRecords.tsLength of output: 503
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The code changes in the `headerstoRecords.test.ts` file update the import statement for the `IncomingHttpHeaders` type from `"http"` to `"node:http"`. This ensures compatibility with the Node.js environment and avoids potential import errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/server/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/server/test/headerstoRecords.test.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
apps/server/test/headerstoRecords.test.ts (2)
5-22: LGTM! The test case is well-implemented.The test case for converting headers to records is straightforward and correctly implemented.
24-32: LGTM! The test case is well-implemented.The test case for handling empty headers is straightforward and correctly implemented.
apps/server/package.json (9)
8-8: LGTM! Thebuildscript enhancement is beneficial.Including the
--buildand--verboseflags in thebuildscript provides clearer output and ensures a thorough compilation of TypeScript files.
12-12: LGTM! The addition of thetestscript is a positive change.Utilizing the
vitesttesting framework enhances the project's testing capabilities and aligns with modern development practices.
12-12: LGTM! Thedevscript enhancement is beneficial.Including a more complex command for registering TypeScript with ECMAScript Modules (ESM) support improves the developer experience and streamlines the workflow.
19-19: LGTM! The update to@types/nodeis beneficial.Incrementing the version of
@types/nodelikely includes important enhancements and fixes.
21-21: LGTM! The update to@vitest/coverage-v8is beneficial.Incrementing the version of
@vitest/coverage-v8likely includes important enhancements and fixes.
22-22: LGTM! The addition of@vitest/uiis beneficial.Introducing
@vitest/uienhances the testing framework with a user interface.
23-23: LGTM! The update toeslintis beneficial.Incrementing the version of
eslintlikely includes important enhancements and fixes.
24-24: LGTM! The addition ofnxis beneficial.Introducing
nximproves the management of monorepos or workspace functionalities.
29-29: LGTM! The update tovitestis beneficial.Incrementing the version of
vitestlikely includes significant changes that could introduce new features or improvements to the testing framework.libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (3)
Line range hint
43-62: LGTM! The test case is well-implemented.The test case for successful login is correctly implemented and ensures that user creation is a prerequisite for authentication.
6-23: LGTM! The test case is well-implemented.The test case for missing username or password is correctly implemented. Ensure that the change in expected response aligns with the new application logic.
Verification successful
Verification Successful: The test case is correctly implemented.
The
handleAuthLoginfunction correctly returns a 200 status code with a generic error message when either the username or password is not provided.
- Implementation of
handleAuthLoginconfirms the expected behavior.- The test case aligns with the application logic.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the change in expected response for missing username or password. # Test: Search for the implementation of `handleAuthLogin`. Expect: The new response logic. rg --type javascript -A 10 $'handleAuthLogin'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the change in expected response for missing username or password. # Step 1: Find all JavaScript files fd -e js # Step 2: Search for the implementation of `handleAuthLogin` in the found JavaScript files fd -e js -x rg 'handleAuthLogin' -A 10Length of output: 213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the change in expected response for missing username or password. # Step 1: Find all TypeScript files fd -e ts # Step 2: Search for the implementation of `handleAuthLogin` in the found TypeScript files fd -e ts -x rg 'function handleAuthLogin' -A 10Length of output: 959
25-41: LGTM! The test case is well-implemented.The test case for nonexistent user is correctly implemented. Ensure that the change in expected response aligns with the new application logic.
Verification successful
LGTM! The test case is well-implemented.
The test case for a nonexistent user is correctly implemented. The
handleAuthLoginfunction returns the expected response with a status code of 200 and a generic error message when the user is not found.
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts: Implementation ofhandleAuthLoginfunction.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the change in expected response for nonexistent user. # Test: Search for the implementation of `handleAuthLogin`. Expect: The new response logic. rg --type javascript -A 10 $'handleAuthLogin'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the change in expected response for nonexistent user. # Locate JavaScript files and search for the implementation of `handleAuthLogin` fd -e js -x rg 'handleAuthLogin' {} +Length of output: 291
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the change in expected response for nonexistent user. # Search for the implementation of `handleAuthLogin` across all files. rg 'handleAuthLogin'Length of output: 666
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the change in expected response for nonexistent user. # Extract the implementation of `handleAuthLogin` from the relevant file. rg --type ts -A 50 'export async function handleAuthLogin' libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.tsLength of output: 1466
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1)
63-76: LGTM! The changes align with new client requirements.The response body format has been altered to plain text, which seems to align with new client requirements.
…ty into drazisil-codecov-patch-1
… the "build" task
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
nx.json (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: nx.json:22-22 Timestamp: 2024-07-25T12:05:20.844Z Learning: Even if an access token is read-only and used for cache purposes, it's still a good practice to avoid hardcoding it and use environment variables instead.
Gitleaks
nx.json
22-22: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (2)
nx.json (2)
8-8: Simplified build dependency approved.The build dependency change from
["clean", "^build"]to["^build"]simplifies the build process and can improve performance.
16-18: Test target addition approved.The addition of the test target with dependencies on the build target and an output directory for coverage reports enhances the testing strategy.
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: npm/@nx/eslint-plugin@19.5.1, npm/@nx/eslint@19.5.1, npm/@nx/vite@19.5.1, npm/@types/eslint__js@8.42.3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)
45-49: LGTM! Verify the correctness of the action version.The step to upload test results to Codecov is correctly configured with a conditional check and secure token usage.
Ensure that
codecov/test-results-action@v1is the correct and latest version for your needs.
50-53: LGTM! Verify the correctness of the action version.The step to upload coverage reports to Codecov is correctly configured with secure token usage.
Ensure that
codecov/codecov-action@v4.0.1is the correct and latest version for your needs.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #22 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 60.11%
=======================================
Files ? 19
Lines ? 682
Branches ? 68
=======================================
Hits ? 410
Misses ? 272
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Makefile (2)
1-2: LGTM!The
testtarget correctly usespnpmto executenxcommands for linting, building, and testing affected projects.
4-4: LGTM!The
@PHONYdeclaration is correctly placed for thetesttarget.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (4)
- libs/web/src/models/User.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/errors.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (2 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts
[warning] 40-44: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts#L40-L44
Added lines #L40 - L44 were not covered by tests
[warning] 135-137: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts#L135-L137
Added lines #L135 - L137 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (14)
libs/web/src/models/User.ts (1)
17-19: LGTM! The use ofdeclarekeyword enhances type safety.The properties
id,username, andpasswordare correctly declared using thedeclarekeyword, enhancing type safety and clarity.libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (6)
6-14: LGTM! The function correctly validates credentials.The
validateCredentialsfunction correctly validates the presence ofusernameandpassword, throwing custom errors if they are missing.
34-36: LGTM! The function correctly creates a new user in the database.The
createUserInDatabasefunction correctly uses theUser.createmethod to create a new user in the database.
52-75: LGTM! The function correctly handles user login.The
userLoginfunction is well-structured, validates credentials, and queries the database for user login. Ensure that the function handles edge cases appropriately.
16-32: LGTM! The function is well-structured and handles errors appropriately.The
createUserfunction is well-structured, validates credentials, and handles errors during user creation. Ensure that the error handling is thoroughly tested.
38-49: LGTM! The function handles errors during user creation appropriately.The
handleCreateUserErrorfunction is well-structured and handles errors, specifically checking for unique constraint violations. Ensure that the error handling logic is thoroughly tested.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 40-44: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts#L40-L44
Added lines #L40 - L44 were not covered by tests
125-138: LGTM! The function correctly handles user deletion and errors.The
deleteUserfunction is well-structured, logs the deletion process, and handles errors during user deletion. Ensure that the error handling logic is thoroughly tested.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 135-137: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts#L135-L137
Added lines #L135 - L137 were not covered by testslibs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (7)
14-31: LGTM! The test case correctly handles missing credentials.The test case has been updated to match the new expected behavior of returning a 200 status code with a generic error message.
35-52: LGTM! The test case correctly handles nonexistent users.The test case has been updated to match the new expected behavior of returning a 200 status code with a generic error message.
61-75: LGTM! The test case correctly handles successful login.The test case has been updated to match the new expected behavior of returning a 200 status code with user data.
79-91: LGTM! The test case correctly handles missing username.The test case correctly checks for the
ErrorMissingCredentialswhen the username is blank.
93-105: LGTM! The test case correctly handles missing password.The test case correctly checks for the
ErrorMissingCredentialswhen the password is blank.
107-120: LGTM! The test case correctly handles existing user.The test case correctly checks for the
ErrorUserExistswhen the user already exists.
122-132: LGTM! The test case correctly handles user creation.The test case correctly checks that the promise is resolved with the user data when a user is created.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/errors.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts
[warning] 47-51: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts#L47-L51
Added lines #L47 - L51 were not covered by tests
[warning] 182-184: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts#L182-L184
Added lines #L182 - L184 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (9)
libs/web/src/services/errors.ts (2)
1-3: Add a constructor to initialize the error message.The
ErrorMissingCredentialsclass should have a constructor to properly initialize the error message.export class ErrorMissingCredentials extends Error { name = "ErrorMissingCredentials"; + constructor(message: string) { + super(message); + this.name = "ErrorMissingCredentials"; + } }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
5-7: Add a constructor to initialize the error message.The
ErrorUserExistsclass should have a constructor to properly initialize the error message.export class ErrorUserExists extends Error { name = "ErrorUserExists"; + constructor(message: string) { + super(message); + this.name = "ErrorUserExists"; + } }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (7)
6-14: LGTM!The
validateCredentialsfunction correctly validates the username and password.
45-56: LGTM!The
handleCreateUserErrorfunction correctly handles errors during user creation.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 47-51: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts#L47-L51
Added lines #L47 - L51 were not covered by tests
66-88: LGTM!The
userLoginfunction correctly authenticates a user by their username and password.
89-116: LGTM!The
handleAuthLoginfunction correctly handles the authentication login process.
123-130: LGTM!The
extractCredentialsfunction correctly extracts the username and password from the parsed HTTP request data.
137-142: LGTM!The
constructLoginResponsefunction correctly constructs a login response object.
153-161: LGTM!The
generateLoginErrorfunction correctly generates a login error response.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/server/src/headerstoRecords.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/errors.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
apps/server/src/headerstoRecords.ts (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: apps/server/src/headerstoRecords.ts:2-2 Timestamp: 2024-07-25T12:08:46.562Z Learning: When importing core modules in Node.js, use the `node:` prefix for better practice.
Additional comments not posted (3)
apps/server/src/headerstoRecords.ts (1)
1-2: Approved: Use ofnode:prefix for core module import.The import path for
IncomingHttpHeadersuses thenode:prefix, which is a good practice.libs/web/src/services/errors.ts (2)
1-8: LGTM!The class
ErrorMissingCredentialscorrectly extends theErrorclass and initializes the error message in the constructor.
10-17: LGTM!The class
ErrorUserExistscorrectly extends theErrorclass and initializes the error message in the constructor.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (13)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (2 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/server/src/headersToRecords.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/server/test/headersToRecords.test.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/errors.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/web/test/errors.test.ts (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- scripts/inject-token.sh (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (4)
libs/web/test/errors.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts:16-32 Timestamp: 2024-07-26T00:50:25.408Z Learning: Unit tests for the `createUser` function should cover scenarios where the username is not unique, causing an `ErrorUserExists` to be thrown, and where any other error occurs during user creation, causing a generic error to be thrown.libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts:16-32 Timestamp: 2024-07-26T00:50:25.408Z Learning: Unit tests for the `createUser` function should cover scenarios where the username is not unique, causing an `ErrorUserExists` to be thrown, and where any other error occurs during user creation, causing a generic error to be thrown.libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts:16-32 Timestamp: 2024-07-26T00:50:25.408Z Learning: Unit tests for the `createUser` function should cover scenarios where the username is not unique, causing an `ErrorUserExists` to be thrown, and where any other error occurs during user creation, causing a generic error to be thrown.apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts:8-8 Timestamp: 2024-07-25T12:07:45.983Z Learning: In the TypeScript codebase for the `rusty` project, `headerstoRecords.js` is the correct file to import from, even though the codebase uses TypeScript.
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
apps/server/src/headersToRecords.ts
[warning] 7-7: apps/server/src/headersToRecords.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by testslibs/web/src/errors.ts
[warning] 42-47: libs/web/src/errors.ts#L42-L47
Added lines #L42 - L47 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts
[warning] 161-163: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts#L161-L163
Added lines #L161 - L163 were not covered by testsapps/server/src/ServerController.ts
[warning] 8-8: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts#L8
Added line #L8 was not covered by tests
[warning] 20-20: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (33)
.gitignore (2)
11-11: LGTM! Adding*.xmlto.gitignoreis appropriate.This change helps in excluding unwanted XML files from version control.
13-13: LGTM! Addingnx.jsonto.gitignoreis appropriate.This change helps in excluding the
nx.jsonconfiguration file from version control.Makefile (2)
1-3: LGTM! Thetesttarget is well-defined.The target runs a script to inject a token and then executes necessary commands for linting, building, and testing.
5-5: LGTM! The@PHONYdirective is correctly used.This ensures that the
testtarget is always executed.scripts/inject-token.sh (2)
4-7: LGTM! The environment variable check is correctly implemented.The script checks if
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis set and exits with an appropriate error message if it is not.
10-10: LGTM! Thesedcommand is correctly used.The script securely replaces the placeholder in
nx.jsonwith the token value.nx.json (2)
8-8: LGTM! Simplified build dependencies.The change simplifies the build process by removing the dependency on the clean target, which can improve build performance.
16-19: LGTM! Improved testing workflow.The new test target ensures that tests run only after successful builds and that coverage data is systematically gathered, fostering a more integrated development workflow.
apps/server/test/headersToRecords.test.ts (2)
6-22: LGTM! Test for converting headers to records.The test correctly verifies that the
headersToRecordsfunction converts headers to records as expected.
24-32: LGTM! Test for handling empty headers.The test correctly verifies that the
headersToRecordsfunction handles empty headers as expected.package.json (1)
21-30: Verify compatibility and integration of new and updated dependencies.Ensure that the new and updated dependencies (
@vitest/coverage-v8,@vitest/ui,typescript-eslint,vite) are compatible and correctly integrated. Also, confirm that the removed dependencies (@nx/eslint,@nx/eslint-plugin,@nx/vite) are no longer needed..github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
45-53: Ensure the correctness and security of Codecov steps.Verify that the steps for uploading test results and coverage reports to Codecov are correctly implemented and secure.
libs/web/src/errors.ts (3)
3-10: LGTM!The
ErrorMissingCredentialsclass is correctly implemented.
12-19: LGTM!The
ErrorUserExistsclass is correctly implemented.
21-28: LGTM!The
ErrorUserNotFoundclass is correctly implemented.libs/web/test/errors.test.ts (7)
10-32: Test case approved: Missing credentials.The test case for missing credentials is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
34-56: Test case approved: Nonexistent user.The test case for a nonexistent user is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
58-80: Test case approved: Successful login.The test case for a successful login is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
84-88: Test case approved: Blank username.The test case for a blank username is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
95-104: Test case approved: Blank password.The test case for a blank password is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
106-117: Test case approved: Existing user.The test case for an existing user is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
117-129: Test case approved: User creation.The test case for successful user creation is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (7)
10-32: Test case approved: Missing credentials.The test case for missing credentials is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
32-49: Test case approved: Nonexistent user.The test case for a nonexistent user is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
Line range hint
50-72: Test case approved: Successful login.The test case for a successful login is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
76-88: Test case approved: Blank username.The test case for a blank username is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
90-102: Test case approved: Blank password.The test case for a blank password is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
104-117: Test case approved: Existing user.The test case for an existing user is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
119-129: Test case approved: User creation.The test case for successful user creation is well-structured and effectively covers the scenario.
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (4)
10-18: Function approved: validateCredentials.The
validateCredentialsfunction is well-structured and effectively validates the credentials.
45-67: Function approved: userLogin.The
userLoginfunction is well-structured and effectively handles the login process.
73-95: Function approved: handleAuthLogin.The
handleAuthLoginfunction is well-structured and effectively handles the login process.
102-143: Utility functions approved.The utility functions
extractCredentials,constructLoginResponse, andgenerateLoginErrorare well-structured and effectively support the main functions.
…ected The deleteUser function in AuthLogin.ts has been modified to return the number of rows affected when a user is deleted. This change improves the clarity and consistency of the function's return value. The corresponding test cases have also been updated to reflect this change. Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (2 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (2 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts:16-32 Timestamp: 2024-07-26T00:50:25.408Z Learning: Unit tests for the `createUser` function should cover scenarios where the username is not unique, causing an `ErrorUserExists` to be thrown, and where any other error occurs during user creation, causing a generic error to be thrown.
Additional comments not posted (23)
.gitignore (2)
11-12: Good addition: Ignore XML files.Adding
*.xmlto.gitignorehelps in excluding potentially unnecessary XML files from version control, keeping the repository clean.
17-17: Good addition: Ignore nx.json.Adding
nx.jsonto.gitignorehelps in excluding this specific configuration file from version control, avoiding accidental commits.package.json (4)
20-20: New dependency: @vitest/coverage-v8.Adding
@vitest/coverage-v8enhances test coverage reporting capabilities, which is a positive step towards better testing practices.
21-21: Dependency update: @vitest/ui.Updating
@vitest/uifrom^1.3.1to^2.0.4improves the testing capabilities and ensures compatibility with the latest features.
27-27: Dependency update: typescript-eslint.Updating
typescript-eslintfrom^7.16.1to^7.17.0ensures compatibility with newer TypeScript features and improvements.
28-28: Dependency update: vite.Updating
vitefrom^5.0.0to^2.0.4ensures compatibility with the latest features and improvements in the Vite build tool..github/workflows/ci.yml (4)
16-16: Environment update: Use ubuntu-22.04.Updating the CI environment to
ubuntu-22.04ensures a more specific and stable environment for the CI processes.
42-42: Streamlined testing: Use make test.Replacing the test command with
make testsimplifies the command structure and clarifies the workflow's intent.
45-47: New step: Upload test results to Codecov.Adding a step to upload test results to Codecov ensures that test results are automatically reported, contributing to better code quality management.
50-51: New step: Upload coverage reports to Codecov.Adding a step to upload coverage reports to Codecov ensures that coverage metrics are automatically reported, providing insights into the testing process.
libs/web/test/AuthLogin.test.ts (5)
1-9: LGTM! Ensure consistency in error handling and response structure.The test cases are well-structured and cover essential scenarios. Ensure that the response structure and error handling are consistent with the updated implementation.
Line range hint
30-72:
LGTM! Ensure thecreateUserfunction is properly tested.The test case for successful login is well-structured. Ensure that the
createUserfunction is properly tested to cover all scenarios.
73-131: LGTM! Ensure consistency in error handling and logging.The test cases are well-structured and cover essential scenarios. Ensure that the error handling and logging are consistent with the updated implementation.
132-154: LGTM! Ensure consistency in error handling and logging.The test cases are well-structured and cover essential scenarios. Ensure that the error handling and logging are consistent with the updated implementation.
10-29: Verify the response structure and error handling.The test cases for handling missing credentials and user not found have been updated to reflect a uniform error handling strategy. Ensure that the response structure and error handling are consistent with the updated implementation.
Verification successful
Verified the response structure and error handling.
The
handleAuthLoginfunction and its associated helper functions (constructLoginResponseandgenerateLoginError) ensure a consistent response structure with a status code of 200, appropriate body content, and headers. The error handling mechanism logs errors and generates a uniform error response.
handleAuthLoginfunction inlibs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.tsgenerateLoginErrorfunction inlibs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the response structure and error handling in `handleAuthLogin`. # Test: Search for the `handleAuthLogin` function implementation. Expect: Consistent response structure and error handling. rg --type typescript -A 10 $'async function handleAuthLogin'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the response structure and error handling in `handleAuthLogin`. # Test: Search for the `handleAuthLogin` function implementation. rg 'async function handleAuthLogin' -A 10Length of output: 711
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Capture the full implementation of the `handleAuthLogin` function to verify response structure and error handling. # Extract the full implementation of the `handleAuthLogin` function. rg 'export async function handleAuthLogin' -A 50 libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.tsLength of output: 1439
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Capture the implementation of the `generateLoginError` function to verify error response structure. # Extract the implementation of the `generateLoginError` function. rg 'function generateLoginError' -A 10Length of output: 775
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (8)
10-18: LGTM!The function is well-structured and ensures that both username and password are provided.
20-34: LGTM!The function is well-structured and ensures that both username and password are provided. Error handling and logging are consistent with best practices.
38-67: LGTM!The function is well-structured and ensures that the user is authenticated by their username and password. Error handling and logging are consistent with best practices.
69-95: LGTM!The function is well-structured and ensures that the authentication login process is handled correctly. Error handling and logging are consistent with best practices.
97-109: LGTM!The function is well-structured and ensures that the username and password are extracted correctly.
111-122: LGTM!The function is well-structured and ensures that the login response object is constructed correctly.
124-142: LGTM!The function is well-structured and ensures that the login error response is generated correctly.
144-158: LGTM!The function is well-structured and ensures that the user is deleted correctly. Error handling and logging are consistent with best practices.
…iles, and add test file for server
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
createUserfunction for user registration in the authentication service.userLoginanddeleteUserfunctions.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores