Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable debug info tests on Windows #8757

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 27, 2013
Merged

Conversation

vadimcn
Copy link
Contributor

@vadimcn vadimcn commented Aug 26, 2013

Now that new LLVM has landed, the debug info works on Windows as well. Most existing tests pass, except for the following four, which I left disabled for now:
lexical-scope-in-for-loop
lexical-scope-in-if
lexical-scope-in-match
lexical-scopes-in-block-expression

Also, fixed a small problem with the debug info test runner.

…latforms.

Otherwise it'll choose some "appropriate" platform-specific default (e.g. CP1252 on Windows).
@vadimcn
Copy link
Contributor Author

vadimcn commented Aug 26, 2013

@michaelwoerister - FYI

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.

// xfail-win32 Broken because of LLVM bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16249
// xfail-win32
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you know why these are broken? (Either way, could you pre-emptively file an issue and reference it here?)

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

That's great! Thanks Vadim!
I'll take a look at the failing test cases after this has landed.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2013
Now that new LLVM has landed, the debug info works on Windows as well.   Most existing tests pass, except for the following four, which I left disabled for now:
lexical-scope-in-for-loop
lexical-scope-in-if
lexical-scope-in-match
lexical-scopes-in-block-expression

Also, fixed a small problem with the debug info test runner.
@bors bors closed this Aug 27, 2013
@bors bors merged commit 7f79b52 into rust-lang:master Aug 27, 2013
Jarcho pushed a commit to Jarcho/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2022
- only compare where predicates to trait bounds when generating where
  clause specific message to fix rust-lang#9151
- use comparable_trait_ref to account for trait bound generics to fix rust-lang#8757
Jarcho pushed a commit to Jarcho/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2022
Jarcho pushed a commit to Jarcho/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2022
…, r=flip1995

Fixes [`trait_duplication_in_bounds`] false positives

Fixes rust-lang#9076 rust-lang#9151 rust-lang#8757.
Partially fixes rust-lang#8771.

changelog: [`trait_duplication_in_bounds`]: Reduce number of false positives.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants