Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix double-drop in Vec::from_iter(vec.into_iter()) specialization when items drop during panic #83629

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
27 changes: 18 additions & 9 deletions library/alloc/src/vec/into_iter.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -85,20 +85,29 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> IntoIter<T, A> {
ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut(self.ptr as *mut T, self.len())
}

pub(super) fn drop_remaining(&mut self) {
unsafe {
ptr::drop_in_place(self.as_mut_slice());
}
self.ptr = self.end;
}
/// Drops remaining elements and relinquishes the backing allocation.
///
/// This is roughly equivalent to the following, but more efficient
///
/// ```
/// # let mut into_iter = Vec::<u8>::with_capacity(10).into_iter();
/// (&mut into_iter).for_each(core::mem::drop);
/// unsafe { core::ptr::write(&mut into_iter, Vec::new().into_iter()); }
/// ```
pub(super) fn forget_allocation_drop_remaining(&mut self) {
let remaining = self.as_raw_mut_slice();

/// Relinquishes the backing allocation, equivalent to
/// `ptr::write(&mut self, Vec::new().into_iter())`
pub(super) fn forget_allocation(&mut self) {
// overwrite the individual fields instead of creating a new
// struct and then overwriting &mut self.
// this creates less assembly
self.cap = 0;
self.buf = unsafe { NonNull::new_unchecked(RawVec::NEW.ptr()) };
self.ptr = self.buf.as_ptr();
self.end = self.buf.as_ptr();

unsafe {
ptr::drop_in_place(remaining);
}
}
}

Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions library/alloc/src/vec/source_iter_marker.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ where
}

// drop any remaining values at the tail of the source
src.drop_remaining();
// but prevent drop of the allocation itself once IntoIter goes out of scope
src.forget_allocation();
// if the drop panics then we also leak any elements collected into dst_buf
src.forget_allocation_drop_remaining();

let vec = unsafe { Vec::from_raw_parts(dst_buf, len, cap) };

Expand Down
38 changes: 37 additions & 1 deletion library/alloc/tests/vec.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ fn test_from_iter_specialization_head_tail_drop() {
}

#[test]
fn test_from_iter_specialization_panic_drop() {
fn test_from_iter_specialization_panic_during_iteration_drops() {
let drop_count: Vec<_> = (0..=2).map(|_| Rc::new(())).collect();
let src: Vec<_> = drop_count.iter().cloned().collect();
let iter = src.into_iter();
Expand All @@ -1050,6 +1050,42 @@ fn test_from_iter_specialization_panic_drop() {
);
}

#[test]
fn test_from_iter_specialization_panic_during_drop_leaks() {
static mut DROP_COUNTER: usize = 0;

#[derive(Debug)]
enum Droppable {
DroppedTwice(Box<i32>),
PanicOnDrop,
}

impl Drop for Droppable {
fn drop(&mut self) {
match self {
Droppable::DroppedTwice(_) => {
unsafe {
DROP_COUNTER += 1;
}
println!("Dropping!")
}
Droppable::PanicOnDrop => {
if !std::thread::panicking() {
panic!();
}
}
}
}
}

let _ = std::panic::catch_unwind(AssertUnwindSafe(|| {
let v = vec![Droppable::DroppedTwice(Box::new(123)), Droppable::PanicOnDrop];
let _ = v.into_iter().take(0).collect::<Vec<_>>();
}));

assert_eq!(unsafe { DROP_COUNTER }, 1);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this test ensure to eventually actually free the memory that was "leaked" as part of the "panic during drop"?

If not, this would be a problem for running the test in Miri -- to ensure that the standard library is memory-leak-free, Miri errors. That's why other tests like this that already exist explicit free the "leaked" memory after the test is done.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it doesn't free. Can you point to a test that does the explicit free so I can steal from that?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think most tests just avoid having a Box, so even if desturctors don't get called, there's no memory leak -- the DROP_COUNTER is usually enough to check that everything is all right.

I thought there were also tests that used manual "late" deallocation of the Box, but cannot find any... do you think checking DROP_COUNTER is sufficient?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That should be possible, yeah. I took the reproducer from #83629 which relied on a double-free to trigger malloc errors and converted it into a test-case.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, that won't do since the vec's storage itself will also get leaked.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, good point!

}

#[test]
fn test_cow_from() {
let borrowed: &[_] = &["borrowed", "(slice)"];
Expand Down