Rollup of 13 pull requests #73880
Closed
Rollup of 13 pull requests #73880
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I know very little about rust, so I saw this example and tried to generalize it by writing,
```
let layout = Layout::new::<T>();
let new_obj = unsafe {
let ptr = alloc(layout) as *mut T;
*ptr = obj;
Box::from_raw(ptr)
};
```
for some more complicated `T`, which ended up crashing with SIGSEGV,
because it tried to `drop_in_place` the previous object in `ptr` which is
of course garbage. I also added a comment that explains why `.write`
is used, but I think adding that comment is optional and may be too verbose
here. I do however think that changing this example is a good idea to
suggest the correct generalization. `.write` is also used in most of the rest
of the documentation here, even if the example is `i32`, so it would additionally
be more consistent.
update master
This commit applies the existing 'extra angle bracket recovery' logic when parsing fields in struct definitions. This allows us to continue parsing the struct's fields, avoiding spurious 'missing field' errors in code that tries to use the struct.
Fixes rust-lang#67765 When reporting errors during MIR region inference, we sometimes use `universal_upper_bound` to obtain a named universal region that we can display to the user. However, this is not always possible - in a case like `fn foo<'a, 'b>() { .. }`, the only upper bound for a region containing `'a` and `'b` is `'static`. When displaying diagnostics, it's usually better to display *some* named region (even if there are multiple involved) rather than fall back to a generic error involving `'static`. This commit adds a new `approx_universal_upper_bound` method, which uses the lowest-numbered universal region if the only alternative is to return `'static`.
Also adds back-ticks when referring to the contents of this collection.
Update Box::from_raw example to generalize better
I know very little about rust, so I saw the example here
```
use std::alloc::{alloc, Layout};
unsafe {
let ptr = alloc(Layout::new::<i32>()) as *mut i32;
*ptr = 5;
let x = Box::from_raw(ptr);
}
```
and tried to generalize it by writing,
```
let layout = Layout::new::<T>();
let new_obj = unsafe {
let ptr = alloc(layout) as *mut T;
*ptr = obj;
Box::from_raw(ptr)
};
```
for some more complicated `T`, which ended up crashing with SIGSEGV,
because it tried to `drop_in_place` the previous object in `ptr` which is
of course garbage. I think that changing this example to use `.write` instead
would be a good idea to suggest the correct generalization. It is also more
consistent with other documentation items in this file, which use `.write`.
I also added a comment to explain it, but I'm not too attached to that,
and can see it being too verbose in this place.
…sKalbertodt Document the static keyword Partial fix of rust-lang#34601. This documents the `static` keyword. It's basically a simplified version of the reference with more examples. @rustbot modify labels: T-doc,C-enhancement
…LukasKalbertodt Remap Windows ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER to ErrorKind::InvalidInput from Other I don't know if this is acceptable or how likely it is to break existing code, but it seem to me ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER "The parameter is incorrect" should map to ErrorKind::InvalidInput "A parameter was incorrect". Previously this value fell through to ErrorKind::Other. I can't speak for anyone but myself, but I instinctively thought it would be InvalidInput.
…ery, r=matthewjasper Recover extra trailing angle brackets in struct definition This commit applies the existing 'extra angle bracket recovery' logic when parsing fields in struct definitions. This allows us to continue parsing the struct's fields, avoiding spurious 'missing field' errors in code that tries to use the struct.
Document the type keyword Partial fix of rust-lang#34601. Two small examples, one clarifying that `type` only defines an alias, not a completely new type, the other explaining the use in traits. @rustbot modify labels: T-doc,C-enhancement
…upper, r=estebank Use an 'approximate' universal upper bound when reporting region errors Fixes rust-lang#67765 When reporting errors during MIR region inference, we sometimes use `universal_upper_bound` to obtain a named universal region that we can display to the user. However, this is not always possible - in a case like `fn foo<'a, 'b>() { .. }`, the only upper bound for a region containing `'a` and `'b` is `'static`. When displaying diagnostics, it's usually better to display *some* named region (even if there are multiple involved) rather than fall back to a generic error involving `'static`. This commit adds a new `approx_universal_upper_bound` method, which uses the lowest-numbered universal region if the only alternative is to return `'static`.
ast_pretty: Pass some token streams and trees by reference Salvaged from an intermediate version of rust-lang#73345.
…bank
Fix wording for anonymous parameter name help
```
--> exercises/functions/functions2.rs:8:15
|
8 | fn call_me(num) {
| ^ expected one of `:`, `@`, or `|`
|
= note: anonymous parameters are removed in the 2018 edition (see RFC 1685)
help: if this is a `self` type, give it a parameter name
|
8 | fn call_me(self: num) {
| ^^^^^^^^^
help: if this was a parameter name, give it a type
|
8 | fn call_me(num: TypeName) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: if this is a type, explicitly ignore the parameter name
|
8 | fn call_me(_: num) {
|
```
This commit changes "if this was a parameter name" to "if this is a parameter name" to match the wording of similar errors.
…-morse Some refactoring around intrinsic type checking So... This PR went a bit overboard. I wanted to make the `rustc_peek` intrinsic safe (cc @ecstatic-morse ), and remembered a long-standing itch of mine. So I made that huge `&str` match for the intrinsic name a match on `Symbol`s (so basically `u32`s). This is unlikely to have a positive perf effect, even if it likely has better codegen (intrinsics are used rarely, mostly once in their wrapper), so it's mostly a consistency thing since other places actually match on the symbol name of the intrinsics.
…nishearth Split and expand nonstandard-style lints unicode unit test. RFC 2457 requested that the `nonstandard_style` series of linted be adjusted to cover the non_ascii_identifier case. However when i read the code of those implementations, it seems they're already supporting non_ascii_identifiers. But the exact rules is a little different than what's proposed in RFC 2457. So I splitted and expanded the existing test case to try to exercise every branch in the code. I think it'll also be easier to examine the cases in these unit tests to see whether it's ok to just leave them as is, or some adjustments are needed. r? @Manishearth
…Simulacrum Remove defunct `-Z print-region-graph`
…jonas-schievink Add newline to rustc MultiSpan docs Also adds back-ticks when referring to the contents of this collection.
Fix Zulip topic format Yet another instance of me making a mistake after copy-pasting :D r? @Dylan-DPC
|
📌 Commit 7f598c0 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 7f598c0 with merge a802d538df85c3a45b4af61d51047da6f01e6759... |
|
💥 Test timed out |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
This keeps happening, clearly something in these PRs is timing out |
This was referenced Jun 30, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
-Z print-region-graph#73841 (Remove defunct-Z print-region-graph)Failed merges:
r? @ghost