Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove redundant method with const variable resolution #63153

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2019

Conversation

varkor
Copy link
Member

@varkor varkor commented Jul 31, 2019

I've also removed a bug!() in const value relation code and replaced it with a FIXME. Now ConstValue::Slice and ConstValue::ByRef will simply fail to unify rather than ICEing, which seems more user-friendly for testers.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @cramertj

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 31, 2019
@cramertj
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 31, 2019

📌 Commit 87e73c1 has been approved by cramertj

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 31, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2019
…cramertj

Remove redundant method with const variable resolution

I've also removed a `bug!()` in const value relation code and replaced it with a `FIXME`. Now `ConstValue::Slice` and `ConstValue::ByRef` will simply fail to unify rather than ICEing, which seems more user-friendly for testers.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2019
…cramertj

Remove redundant method with const variable resolution

I've also removed a `bug!()` in const value relation code and replaced it with a `FIXME`. Now `ConstValue::Slice` and `ConstValue::ByRef` will simply fail to unify rather than ICEing, which seems more user-friendly for testers.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2019
…cramertj

Remove redundant method with const variable resolution

I've also removed a `bug!()` in const value relation code and replaced it with a `FIXME`. Now `ConstValue::Slice` and `ConstValue::ByRef` will simply fail to unify rather than ICEing, which seems more user-friendly for testers.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2019
…cramertj

Remove redundant method with const variable resolution

I've also removed a `bug!()` in const value relation code and replaced it with a `FIXME`. Now `ConstValue::Slice` and `ConstValue::ByRef` will simply fail to unify rather than ICEing, which seems more user-friendly for testers.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2019
…cramertj

Remove redundant method with const variable resolution

I've also removed a `bug!()` in const value relation code and replaced it with a `FIXME`. Now `ConstValue::Slice` and `ConstValue::ByRef` will simply fail to unify rather than ICEing, which seems more user-friendly for testers.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2019
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #62663 (More questionmarks in doctests)
 - #62969 (Changing the structure of `mir::interpret::InterpError`)
 - #63153 (Remove redundant method with const variable resolution)
 - #63189 (Doc improvements)
 - #63198 (Allow trailing comma in macro 2.0 declarations.)
 - #63202 (Fix ICE in #63135)
 - #63203 (Make is_mutable use PlaceRef instead of it's fields)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 87e73c1 into rust-lang:master Aug 2, 2019
@varkor varkor deleted the remove-resolve_const_var branch August 2, 2019 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants