Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #130534

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests #130534

merged 25 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 25 commits August 22, 2024 14:22
In the implementation of `force_mut`, I chose performance over safety.
For `LazyLock` this isn't really a choice; the code has to be unsafe.
But for `LazyCell`, we can have a full-safe implementation, but it will
be a bit less performant, so I went with the unsafe approach.
When we have two types with the same name, one without type parameters and the other with type parameters and a derive macro, we were before incorrectly suggesting to remove type parameters from the former, which ICEd because we were suggesting to remove nothing. We now gate against this.

The output is still not perfect. E0107 should explicitly detect this case and provide better context, but for now let's avoid the ICE.
This is ignored by LLVM, but is still incorrect.
The previous name is just an LLVMism, which conveys almost nothing about
what is actually meant by the function relative to the ABI.

In doing so, remove an already-addressed FIXME.
Add `Thread::{into_raw, from_raw}`

Public API:
```rust
#![unstable(feature = "thread_raw", issue = "97523")]

impl Thread {
    pub fn into_raw(self) -> *const ();
    pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *const ()) -> Thread;
}
```

ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#200
Do not ICE with incorrect empty suggestion

When we have two types with the same name, one without type parameters and the other with type parameters and a derive macro, we were before incorrectly suggesting to remove type parameters from the former, which ICEd because we were suggesting to remove nothing. We now gate against this.

The output is still not perfect. E0107 should explicitly detect this case and provide better context, but for now let's avoid the ICE.

Fix rust-lang#108748.
Gate `repr(Rust)` correctly on non-ADT items

rust-lang#114201 added `repr(Rust)` but didn't add any attribute validation to it like `repr(C)` has, to only allow it on ADT items.

I consider this code to be nonsense, for example:
```
#[repr(Rust)]
fn foo() {}
```

Reminder that it's different from `extern "Rust"`, which *is* valid on function items. But also this now disallows `repr(Rust)` on modules, impls, traits, etc.

I'll crater it, if it looks bad then I'll add an FCW.

---

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/relnotes: Compatibility (minor breaking change).
…nieu

Win: Open dir for sync access in remove_dir_all

A small follow up to rust-lang#129800.

We should explicitly open directories for synchronous access. We ultimately use `GetFileInformationByHandleEx` to read directories which should paper over any issues caused by using async directory reads (or else return an error) but it's better to do the right thing in the first place. Note though that `delete` does not read or write any data so it's not necessary there.
…irect, r=bjorn3

Reduce confusion about `make_indirect_byval` by renaming it

As part of doing so, remove the incorrect handling of the wasm target's `make_indirect_byval` (i.e. using it at all).
…ake-2, r=Amanieu

Implement ACP 429: add `Lazy{Cell,Lock}::get[_mut]` and `force_mut`

Tracking issue for `lazy_get`: rust-lang#129333
Update the minimum external LLVM to 18

With this change, we'll have stable support for LLVM 18 and 19.
For reference, the previous increase to LLVM 17 was rust-lang#122649.

cc `@rust-lang/wg-llvm`
r? nikic
…cuviper

Clarify docs for std::fs::File::write

This PR fixes the doc comment for `std::fs::File::write` method.
…hs, r=compiler-errors

[Clippy] Swap `manual_retain` to use diagnostic items instead of paths

Part of rust-lang/rust-clippy#5393, just a chore.
@rustbot rustbot added A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-windows Operating system: Windows S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Sep 18, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 18, 2024
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=9

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 18, 2024

📌 Commit 4bd9de5 has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 18, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 18, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 4bd9de5 with merge a5cf8bb...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 19, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: workingjubilee
Pushing a5cf8bb to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 19, 2024
@bors bors merged commit a5cf8bb into rust-lang:master Sep 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 19, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#97524 Add Thread::{into_raw, from_raw} bb573de65117308851e29a781e182c5b274951f6 (link)
#127988 Do not ICE with incorrect empty suggestion 4e8b520aee90fd7b05dfb480506db17b210720da (link)
#129422 Gate repr(Rust) correctly on non-ADT items ff533dd4997b5bd7552706efaa6f310c86b314b1 (link)
#129934 Win: Open dir for sync access in remove_dir_all 37d3b06e43db3a3f1cb7c5bfdd9626aac128661c (link)
#130450 Reduce confusion about make_indirect_byval by renaming it 282ec54e95e8ab718b61b02a7c3c975a80f7e937 (link)
#130476 Implement ACP 429: add Lazy{Cell,Lock}::get[_mut] and `fo… 2287c30afc91b7a59bfcabbc4755e5f2b65ad217 (link)
#130487 Update the minimum external LLVM to 18 fe489e4066f934b7df6551d1918207bda180f5fe (link)
#130513 Clarify docs for std::fs::File::write 8a3110b6ba95b32d019613d9494ddddbc6f5a06b (link)
#130522 [Clippy] Swap manual_retain to use diagnostic items inste… 6b0efb20d021657f99b962b1ce550b9ef1732255 (link)

previous master: f79a912d9e

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a5cf8bb): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.3% [0.2%, 0.3%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.1% [-1.2%, -0.6%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.3% [0.2%, 0.3%] 3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 0.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.9% [0.7%, 3.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

Results (primary -0.3%, secondary -1.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.1% [-1.1%, -1.1%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 3

Bootstrap: 769.338s -> 766.835s (-0.33%)
Artifact size: 341.29 MiB -> 341.29 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Sep 19, 2024
@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the rollup-furaug4 branch September 19, 2024 03:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. O-windows Operating system: Windows perf-regression Performance regression. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.