Rollup of 9 pull requests

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/consts.rs

@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ impl<'ll> CodegenCx<'ll, '_> {
             let val_llty = self.val_ty(v);
 
             let g = self.get_static_inner(def_id, val_llty);
-            let llty = self.val_ty(g);
+            let llty = llvm::LLVMGlobalGetValueType(g);
 
             let g = if val_llty == llty {
                 g

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs

@@ -974,6 +974,7 @@ unsafe extern "C" {
     pub fn LLVMGetAlignment(Global: &Value) -> c_uint;
     pub fn LLVMSetAlignment(Global: &Value, Bytes: c_uint);
     pub fn LLVMSetDLLStorageClass(V: &Value, C: DLLStorageClass);
+    pub fn LLVMGlobalGetValueType(Global: &Value) -> &Type;
 
     // Operations on global variables
     pub fn LLVMIsAGlobalVariable(GlobalVar: &Value) -> Option<&Value>;

compiler/rustc_lint/src/lib.rs

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #![doc(html_root_url = "https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/")]
 #![doc(rust_logo)]
 #![feature(array_windows)]
+#![feature(assert_matches)]
 #![feature(box_patterns)]
 #![feature(control_flow_enum)]
 #![feature(extract_if)]

compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs

@@ -612,7 +612,9 @@ fn write_mir_sig(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, body: &Body<'_>, w: &mut dyn io::Write) -> io:
     let def_id = body.source.def_id();
     let kind = tcx.def_kind(def_id);
     let is_function = match kind {
-        DefKind::Fn | DefKind::AssocFn | DefKind::Ctor(..) => true,
+        DefKind::Fn | DefKind::AssocFn | DefKind::Ctor(..) | DefKind::SyntheticCoroutineBody => {
+            true
+        }
         _ => tcx.is_closure_like(def_id),
     };
     match (kind, body.source.promoted) {

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coroutine/by_move_body.rs

@@ -207,11 +207,12 @@ pub fn coroutine_by_move_body_def_id<'tcx>(
 
     let mut by_move_body = body.clone();
     MakeByMoveBody { tcx, field_remapping, by_move_coroutine_ty }.visit_body(&mut by_move_body);
-    dump_mir(tcx, false, "coroutine_by_move", &0, &by_move_body, |_, _| Ok(()));
 
-    let body_def = tcx.create_def(coroutine_def_id, kw::Empty, DefKind::SyntheticCoroutineBody);
+    // This will always be `{closure#1}`, since the original coroutine is `{closure#0}`.
+    let body_def = tcx.create_def(parent_def_id, kw::Empty, DefKind::SyntheticCoroutineBody);
     by_move_body.source =
         mir::MirSource::from_instance(InstanceKind::Item(body_def.def_id().to_def_id()));
+    dump_mir(tcx, false, "built", &"after", &by_move_body, |_, _| Ok(()));
 
     // Inherited from the by-ref coroutine.
     body_def.codegen_fn_attrs(tcx.codegen_fn_attrs(coroutine_def_id).clone());

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/dest_prop.rs

@@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ impl<'tcx> crate::MirPass<'tcx> for DestinationPropagation {
 
     fn run_pass(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>) {
         let def_id = body.source.def_id();
-        let mut allocations = Allocations::default();
+        let mut candidates = Candidates::default();
+        let mut write_info = WriteInfo::default();
         trace!(func = ?tcx.def_path_str(def_id));
 
         let borrowed = rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::borrowed_locals(body);
@@ -191,20 +192,15 @@ impl<'tcx> crate::MirPass<'tcx> for DestinationPropagation {
         loop {
             // PERF: Can we do something smarter than recalculating the candidates and liveness
             // results?
-            let mut candidates = find_candidates(
-                body,
-                &borrowed,
-                &mut allocations.candidates,
-                &mut allocations.candidates_reverse,
-            );
+            candidates.reset_and_find(body, &borrowed);
             trace!(?candidates);
             dest_prop_mir_dump(tcx, body, &points, &live, round_count);
 
             FilterInformation::filter_liveness(
                 &mut candidates,
                 &points,
                 &live,
-                &mut allocations.write_info,
+                &mut write_info,
                 body,
             );
 
@@ -253,20 +249,8 @@ impl<'tcx> crate::MirPass<'tcx> for DestinationPropagation {
     }
 }
 
-/// Container for the various allocations that we need.
-///
-/// We store these here and hand out `&mut` access to them, instead of dropping and recreating them
-/// frequently. Everything with a `&'alloc` lifetime points into here.
-#[derive(Default)]
-struct Allocations {
-    candidates: FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
-    candidates_reverse: FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
-    write_info: WriteInfo,
-    // PERF: Do this for `MaybeLiveLocals` allocations too.
-}
-
-#[derive(Debug)]
-struct Candidates<'alloc> {
+#[derive(Debug, Default)]
+struct Candidates {
     /// The set of candidates we are considering in this optimization.
     ///
     /// We will always merge the key into at most one of its values.
@@ -281,11 +265,12 @@ struct Candidates<'alloc> {
     ///
     /// We will still report that we would like to merge `_1` and `_2` in an attempt to allow us to
     /// remove that assignment.
-    c: &'alloc mut FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
+    c: FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
+
     /// A reverse index of the `c` set; if the `c` set contains `a => Place { local: b, proj }`,
     /// then this contains `b => a`.
     // PERF: Possibly these should be `SmallVec`s?
-    reverse: &'alloc mut FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
+    reverse: FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
 }
 
 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
@@ -358,19 +343,40 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MutVisitor<'tcx> for Merger<'a, 'tcx> {
 //
 // This section enforces bullet point 2
 
-struct FilterInformation<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> {
-    body: &'body Body<'tcx>,
+struct FilterInformation<'a, 'tcx> {
+    body: &'a Body<'tcx>,
     points: &'a DenseLocationMap,
     live: &'a SparseIntervalMatrix<Local, PointIndex>,
-    candidates: &'a mut Candidates<'alloc>,
-    write_info: &'alloc mut WriteInfo,
+    candidates: &'a mut Candidates,
+    write_info: &'a mut WriteInfo,
     at: Location,
 }
 
 // We first implement some utility functions which we will expose removing candidates according to
 // different needs. Throughout the liveness filtering, the `candidates` are only ever accessed
 // through these methods, and not directly.
-impl<'alloc> Candidates<'alloc> {
+impl Candidates {
+    /// Collects the candidates for merging.
+    ///
+    /// This is responsible for enforcing the first and third bullet point.
+    fn reset_and_find<'tcx>(&mut self, body: &Body<'tcx>, borrowed: &BitSet<Local>) {
+        self.c.clear();
+        self.reverse.clear();
+        let mut visitor = FindAssignments { body, candidates: &mut self.c, borrowed };
+        visitor.visit_body(body);
+        // Deduplicate candidates.
+        for (_, cands) in self.c.iter_mut() {
+            cands.sort();
+            cands.dedup();
+        }
+        // Generate the reverse map.
+        for (src, cands) in self.c.iter() {
+            for dest in cands.iter().copied() {
+                self.reverse.entry(dest).or_default().push(*src);
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
     /// Just `Vec::retain`, but the condition is inverted and we add debugging output
     fn vec_filter_candidates(
         src: Local,
@@ -445,7 +451,7 @@ enum CandidateFilter {
     Remove,
 }
 
-impl<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> FilterInformation<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> {
+impl<'a, 'tcx> FilterInformation<'a, 'tcx> {
     /// Filters the set of candidates to remove those that conflict.
     ///
     /// The steps we take are exactly those that are outlined at the top of the file. For each
@@ -463,12 +469,12 @@ impl<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> FilterInformation<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> {
     /// before the statement/terminator will correctly report locals that are read in the
     /// statement/terminator to be live. We are additionally conservative by treating all written to
     /// locals as also being read from.
-    fn filter_liveness<'b>(
-        candidates: &mut Candidates<'alloc>,
+    fn filter_liveness(
+        candidates: &mut Candidates,
         points: &DenseLocationMap,
         live: &SparseIntervalMatrix<Local, PointIndex>,
-        write_info_alloc: &'alloc mut WriteInfo,
-        body: &'b Body<'tcx>,
+        write_info: &mut WriteInfo,
+        body: &Body<'tcx>,
     ) {
         let mut this = FilterInformation {
             body,
@@ -477,7 +483,7 @@ impl<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> FilterInformation<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> {
             candidates,
             // We don't actually store anything at this scope, we just keep things here to be able
             // to reuse the allocation.
-            write_info: write_info_alloc,
+            write_info,
             // Doesn't matter what we put here, will be overwritten before being used
             at: Location::START,
         };
@@ -734,40 +740,13 @@ fn places_to_candidate_pair<'tcx>(
     Some((a, b))
 }
 
-/// Collects the candidates for merging
-///
-/// This is responsible for enforcing the first and third bullet point.
-fn find_candidates<'alloc, 'tcx>(
-    body: &Body<'tcx>,
-    borrowed: &BitSet<Local>,
-    candidates: &'alloc mut FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
-    candidates_reverse: &'alloc mut FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
-) -> Candidates<'alloc> {
-    candidates.clear();
-    candidates_reverse.clear();
-    let mut visitor = FindAssignments { body, candidates, borrowed };
-    visitor.visit_body(body);
-    // Deduplicate candidates
-    for (_, cands) in candidates.iter_mut() {
-        cands.sort();
-        cands.dedup();
-    }
-    // Generate the reverse map
-    for (src, cands) in candidates.iter() {
-        for dest in cands.iter().copied() {
-            candidates_reverse.entry(dest).or_default().push(*src);
-        }
-    }
-    Candidates { c: candidates, reverse: candidates_reverse }
-}
-
-struct FindAssignments<'a, 'alloc, 'tcx> {
+struct FindAssignments<'a, 'tcx> {
     body: &'a Body<'tcx>,
-    candidates: &'alloc mut FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
+    candidates: &'a mut FxIndexMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
     borrowed: &'a BitSet<Local>,
 }
 
-impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for FindAssignments<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
+impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for FindAssignments<'_, 'tcx> {
     fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, _: Location) {
         if let StatementKind::Assign(box (
             lhs,
@@ -819,9 +798,9 @@ fn is_local_required(local: Local, body: &Body<'_>) -> bool {
 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 // MIR Dump
 
-fn dest_prop_mir_dump<'body, 'tcx>(
+fn dest_prop_mir_dump<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
-    body: &'body Body<'tcx>,
+    body: &Body<'tcx>,
     points: &DenseLocationMap,
     live: &SparseIntervalMatrix<Local, PointIndex>,
     round: usize,

library/core/src/marker.rs

@@ -288,8 +288,19 @@ marker_impls! {
 /// }
 /// ```
 ///
-/// There is a small difference between the two: the `derive` strategy will also place a `Copy`
-/// bound on type parameters, which isn't always desired.
+/// There is a small difference between the two. The `derive` strategy will also place a `Copy`
+/// bound on type parameters:
+///
+/// ```
+/// #[derive(Clone)]
+/// struct MyStruct<T>(T);
+///
+/// impl<T: Copy> Copy for MyStruct<T> { }
+/// ```
+///
+/// This isn't always desired. For example, shared references (`&T`) can be copied regardless of
+/// whether `T` is `Copy`. Likewise, a generic struct containing markers such as [`PhantomData`]
+/// could potentially be duplicated with a bit-wise copy.
 ///
 /// ## What's the difference between `Copy` and `Clone`?
 ///

src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/check.rs

@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ impl Step for Std {
         // We skip populating the sysroot in non-zero stage because that'll lead
         // to rlib/rmeta conflicts if std gets built during this session.
         if compiler.stage == 0 {
-            let libdir = builder.sysroot_libdir(compiler, target);
-            let hostdir = builder.sysroot_libdir(compiler, compiler.host);
+            let libdir = builder.sysroot_target_libdir(compiler, target);
+            let hostdir = builder.sysroot_target_libdir(compiler, compiler.host);
             add_to_sysroot(builder, &libdir, &hostdir, &libstd_stamp(builder, compiler, target));
         }
         drop(_guard);
@@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ impl Step for Rustc {
             false,
         );
 
-        let libdir = builder.sysroot_libdir(compiler, target);
-        let hostdir = builder.sysroot_libdir(compiler, compiler.host);
+        let libdir = builder.sysroot_target_libdir(compiler, target);
+        let hostdir = builder.sysroot_target_libdir(compiler, compiler.host);
         add_to_sysroot(builder, &libdir, &hostdir, &librustc_stamp(builder, compiler, target));
     }
 }