Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not call source_span when not tracking dependencies. #129513

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

Split from #127241

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 24, 2024

r? @compiler-errors

rustbot has assigned @compiler-errors.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 24, 2024
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 24, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2024
Do not call source_span when not tracking dependencies.

Split from rust-lang#127241
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 24, 2024

⌛ Trying commit bb17fda with merge c09d9f8...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 25, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: c09d9f8 (c09d9f8ba914677996613f7a2d3c9284db39737b)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c09d9f8): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-0.4%, -0.2%] 24
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.2% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.4%, -0.2%] 24

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.0% [-1.0%, -1.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.0% [-1.0%, -1.0%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 750.904s -> 750.776s (-0.02%)
Artifact size: 338.92 MiB -> 338.88 MiB (-0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 25, 2024
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 25, 2024

📌 Commit bb17fda has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 25, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2024
…enkov

Do not call source_span when not tracking dependencies.

Split from rust-lang#127241
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 26, 2024

⌛ Testing commit bb17fda with merge 42fadbd...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-ext failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
[RUSTC-TIMING] miri test:false 4.547
error: failed to remove file `C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage1-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\release\miri.exe`

Caused by:
  Access is denied. (os error 5)
Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.
  local time: Mon, Aug 26, 2024 12:55:27 PM
  network time: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:55:27 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 26, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 26, 2024
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 26, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2024
…enkov

Do not call source_span when not tracking dependencies.

Split from rust-lang#127241
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 27, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
…enkov

Do not call source_span when not tracking dependencies.

Split from rust-lang#127241
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 27, 2024

⌛ Testing commit bb17fda with merge a922197...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-ext failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
[RUSTC-TIMING] miri test:false 4.505
error: failed to remove file `C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage1-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\release\miri.exe`

Caused by:
  Access is denied. (os error 5)
Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.
  local time: Tue, Aug 27, 2024  4:52:55 AM
  network time: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 04:52:56 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 27, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 27, 2024
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

tgross35 commented Aug 27, 2024

@bors retry #127883

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 27, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
…enkov

Do not call source_span when not tracking dependencies.

Split from rust-lang#127241
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 27, 2024

⌛ Testing commit bb17fda with merge 64b0ee6...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job i686-gnu-nopt failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 27, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 27, 2024
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 27, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 27, 2024

⌛ Testing commit bb17fda with merge ab869e0...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 27, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing ab869e0 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 27, 2024
@bors bors merged commit ab869e0 into rust-lang:master Aug 27, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Aug 27, 2024
@cjgillot cjgillot deleted the fast-source-span branch August 27, 2024 21:28
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (ab869e0): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-0.4%, -0.2%] 20
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.4%, -0.2%] 20

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.1% [2.1%, 2.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.1% [2.1%, 2.1%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary -2.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 749.925s -> 750.285s (0.05%)
Artifact size: 338.74 MiB -> 338.87 MiB (0.04%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants