Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #126726

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #126726

merged 15 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

oli-obk and others added 15 commits June 18, 2024 15:43
…cause of the bound that binds the parameter's type
People were tripped up by the "precludes", interpreting it that this function
must not ever be used in cryptographic contexts rather than the std lib merely
making zero promises about it being fit-for-purpose.

What remains unchanged is that if someone does try to use it *despite the warnings*
then it is on them to pin their compiler versions and verify the assembly of every
single binary build they do.
It's clearer this way, because the `Interpolated` cases in
`can_begin_const_arg` and `is_pat_range_end_start` are more permissive
than the `Interpolated` cases in `can_begin_literal_maybe_minus`.
We currently use `can_begin_literal_maybe_minus` in a couple of places
where only string literals are allowed. This commit introduces a
more specific function, which makes things clearer. It doesn't change
behaviour because the two functions affected (`is_unsafe_foreign_mod`
and `check_keyword_case`) are always followed by a call to `parse_abi`,
which checks again for a string literal.
Actually taint InferCtxt when a fulfillment error is emitted

And avoid checking the global error counter

fixes rust-lang#122044
fixes rust-lang#123255
fixes rust-lang#123276
fixes rust-lang#125799
Fix `feature = "nightly"` in the new trait solver

r? lcnr
…orn3,Urgau

Clarify that anonymous consts still do introduce a new scope

See rust-lang#120363 (comment)

This error message is misleading: it's trying to say that `const _ : () = ...` is a workaround for the lint, but by saying that anonymous constants are treated as being in the parent scope, it makes them appear useless for scope-hiding.

They *are* useful for scope-hiding, they are simply treated as part of the parent scope when it comes to this lint.
…scottmcm

reword the hint::blackbox non-guarantees

People were tripped up by the "precludes", interpreting it that this function must not ever be used in cryptographic contexts rather than the std lib merely making zero promises about it being fit-for-purpose.

What remains unchanged is that if someone does try to use it *despite the warnings* then it is on them to pin their compiler versions and verify the assembly of every single binary build they do.
…eral_maybe_minus, r=compiler-errors

Minimize `can_begin_literal_maybe_minus` usage

`can_begin_literal_maybe_minus` is used in a few confusing ways. This PR makes them clearer.

r? ``@spastorino``
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 20, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 20, 2024

📌 Commit c979535 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 20, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 20, 2024

⌛ Testing commit c979535 with merge 1208edd...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 20, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 1208edd to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 20, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 1208edd into rust-lang:master Jun 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 20, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#126620 Actually taint InferCtxt when a fulfillment error is emitted 053c10c9490371bb856d375b7d6214c6a050f787 (link)
#126649 Fix feature = "nightly" in the new trait solver 4f307e3ff1ffab19167b4a249aa39a4660611140 (link)
#126652 Clarify that anonymous consts still do introduce a new scope 402ab21c9ae1027b3e3503298ddfa49cc6db8f7f (link)
#126703 reword the hint::blackbox non-guarantees 33004feff1f894a712fbe132b44d974b8a8b90ef (link)
#126708 Minimize can_begin_literal_maybe_minus usage a5fb2d57154e6c9e0a34cbe2ce9ed18f8c7236df (link)

previous master: 54fcd5bb92

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1208edd): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.0% [-2.0%, -2.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.0% [-2.0%, -2.0%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 690.827s -> 690.663s (-0.02%)
Artifact size: 323.74 MiB -> 323.78 MiB (0.01%)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-ppe8ve3 branch September 1, 2024 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants