Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pattern_analysis: Let ctor_sub_tys return any Iterator they want #120317

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2024

Conversation

Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

I noticed that we always .cloned() and allocate the output of TypeCx::ctor_sub_tys now, so there was no need to force it to return a slice. ExactSizeIterator is not super important but saves some manual counting.

r? @compiler-errors

Since we always clone and allocate the types somewhere else ourselves,
no need to ask for `Cx` to do the allocation.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 24, 2024
&'a self,
ctor: &'a Constructor<Self>,
ty: &'a Self::Ty,
) -> impl Iterator<Item = Self::Ty> + ExactSizeIterator + Captures<'a>;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RPITIT? 😄

Copy link
Member Author

@Nadrieril Nadrieril Jan 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes :D Finally we can (and I checked that r-a is fine to bump the MSRV)

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 24, 2024

📌 Commit e088016 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 24, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119305 (Add `AsyncFn` family of traits)
 - rust-lang#119389 (Provide more context on recursive `impl` evaluation overflow)
 - rust-lang#119895 (Remove `track_errors` entirely)
 - rust-lang#120230 (Assert that a single scope is passed to `for_scope`)
 - rust-lang#120278 (Remove --fatal-warnings on wasm targets)
 - rust-lang#120292 (coverage: Dismantle `Instrumentor` and flatten span refinement)
 - rust-lang#120315 (On E0308 involving `dyn Trait`, mention trait objects)
 - rust-lang#120317 (pattern_analysis: Let `ctor_sub_tys` return any Iterator they want)
 - rust-lang#120318 (pattern_analysis: Reuse most of the `DeconstructedPat` `Debug` impl)
 - rust-lang#120325 (rustc_data_structures: use either instead of itertools)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b677c77 into rust-lang:master Jan 25, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 25, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120317 - Nadrieril:dont-force-slice-of-ty, r=compiler-errors

pattern_analysis: Let `ctor_sub_tys` return any Iterator they want

I noticed that we always `.cloned()` and allocate the output of `TypeCx::ctor_sub_tys` now, so there was no need to force it to return a slice. `ExactSizeIterator` is not super important but saves some manual counting.

r? `@compiler-errors`
@Nadrieril Nadrieril deleted the dont-force-slice-of-ty branch January 25, 2024 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants