Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustc_span: Remove unused symbols. #118456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member

As noted here, there is no guarantee that all pre-interned symbols are used.

// There is currently no checking that all symbols are used; that would be
// nice to have.

This was done starting with using ripgrep to search for sym::whatever. I removed anything that didn't show up. However this had a huge number of false positives, due to extensive macro use. Then there was a manual phase of adding back all the ones used my macros.

I don't think this was worth my time to do, but it's done now . ¯_(ツ)_/¯

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 29, 2023

r? @WaffleLapkin

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 29, 2023
@aDotInTheVoid aDotInTheVoid added the C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. label Nov 29, 2023
@aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member Author

As for weather this could be checked automatically in tidy, I don't think there's any easy way to do that, as it can't be answered with any text-based search.

Copy link
Member

@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me with green CI

(and I'm sorry for your lost time ;-;)

@aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=WaffleLapkin

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

📌 Commit 32c035c has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 29, 2023
@aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member Author

@bors rollup=always

@DaniPopes
Copy link
Contributor

As for weather this could be checked automatically in tidy, I don't think there's any easy way to do that, as it can't be answered with any text-based search.

FWIW I tried this previously in #110437

Realized that I never opened a follow-up to remove just the unused symbols 😞

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118452 (rustdoc-search: allow spaces around `::` in path query)
 - rust-lang#118453 (Tweak message on ADT with private fields building)
 - rust-lang#118456 (rustc_span: Remove unused symbols.)
 - rust-lang#118458 (rustdoc: remove small from  `small-section-header`)
 - rust-lang#118464 (Dispose llvm::TargetMachines prior to llvm::Context being disposed)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e31cd93 into rust-lang:master Nov 30, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 30, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118456 - aDotInTheVoid:unused-symbols, r=WaffleLapkin

rustc_span: Remove unused symbols.

As noted  here, there is no guarantee that all pre-interned symbols are used.

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b10cfcd65fd7f7b1ab9beb34798b2108de003452/compiler/rustc_span/src/symbol.rs#L124-L125

This was done starting with using ripgrep to search for `sym::whatever`. I removed anything that didn't show up. However this had a huge number of false positives, due to extensive macro use. Then there was a manual phase of adding back all the ones used my macros.

I don't think this was worth my time to do, but it's done now . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants