Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #118046

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Nov 18, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #118046

merged 19 commits into from
Nov 18, 2023

Conversation

TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki commented Nov 18, 2023

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

fintelia and others added 19 commits October 14, 2023 16:20
Take into account implicit dereferences when suggesting fields.

```
error[E0609]: no field `longname` on type `Arc<S>`
  --> $DIR/suggest-field-through-deref.rs:10:15
   |
LL |     let _ = x.longname;
   |               ^^^^^^^^ help: a field with a similar name exists: `long_name`
```

CC rust-lang#78374 (comment)
When encountering a `Result<T, _>` or `Option<T>` where `T` has a field
that's being accessed, suggest calling `.unwrap()` to get to the field.
…k-Simulacrum

Add Seek::seek_relative

The `BufReader` struct has a `seek_relative` method because its `Seek::seek` implementation involved dumping the internal buffer (rust-lang#31100).

Unfortunately, there isn't really a good way to take advantage of that method in generic code. This PR adds the same method to the main `Seek` trait with the straightforward default method, and an override for `BufReader` that calls its implementation.

_Also discussed in [this](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/add-seek-seek-relative/19546) internals.rust-lang.org thread._
…=b-naber

Suggest field typo through derefs

Take into account implicit dereferences when suggesting fields.

```
error[E0609]: no field `longname` on type `Arc<S>`
  --> $DIR/suggest-field-through-deref.rs:10:15
   |
LL |     let _ = x.longname;
   |               ^^^^^^^^ help: a field with a similar name exists: `long_name`
```

CC rust-lang#78374 (comment)
Add `x suggest` entries for testing `mir-opt` and `coverage`

The `x suggest` subcommand uses git to find paths that have been modified, and uses those paths to suggest relevant test suites to run.

This PR adds suggestions for `x test mir-opt` and `x test coverage` .
Fix links to `From<{OwnedHandle, OwnedFd}> for std::process::Child{Stdin, Stdout, Stderr}` in 1.74 release notes
…ulacrum

bump few deps to fix unsoundness and drop few dup deps

jsondocck: bump jsonpath to 0.3, dropping few dup dependencies
changes: freestrings/jsonpath@v0.2.6...v0.3.0

self_cell: bump to 0.10.3 due to RUSTSEC-2023-0070
https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2023-0070.html Voultapher/self_cell#49

bump h2 to 0.3.22, dropping few dup crate versions
https://github.com/hyperium/h2/blob/v0.3.22/CHANGELOG.md
@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Nov 18, 2023
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Nov 18, 2023

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2023

📌 Commit 62e71fa has been approved by TaKO8Ki

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 18, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 62e71fa with merge 4cb3bee...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: TaKO8Ki
Pushing 4cb3bee to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 18, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 4cb3bee into rust-lang:master Nov 18, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 18, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#116750 Add Seek::seek_relative 0d9e0b6daa04f944ff557d6fc92605a21b80e6ab (link)
#117110 Suggest field typo through derefs 7541ffdcd4c8f1a023cf9036a8e72647f486bd0a (link)
#117961 Add x suggest entries for testing mir-opt and coverage d88a018433d9665d53504160d88dea4bb4cfe6a5 (link)
#118020 Fix links to `From<{OwnedHandle, OwnedFd}> for std::process… df950fce992679c5945c4beaa0b1c7ef733431dd (link)
#118034 bump few deps to fix unsoundness and drop few dup deps 23a170757c3bbb7ae162e466fb827c30c77d0c2e (link)

previous master: 28345f06d7

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4cb3bee): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.6% [-0.6%, -0.6%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.2% [4.2%, 4.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-3.4%, -3.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 675.681s -> 673.122s (-0.38%)
Artifact size: 313.84 MiB -> 313.81 MiB (-0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants